Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government

被引:199
作者
Buffat, Aurelien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Inst Polit & Int Studies, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
accountability; discretion; E-government; street-level bureaucracy; DISCRETION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2013.771699
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
With the intensive use of information and communication technologies, governments are transforming into e-governments. While public management research has given increased attention to this subject lately, this article reviews the limited literature that deals with the impacts of e-government technologies on street-level bureaucracies. A twofold argument is being developed. First, what can be called the 'curtailment thesis', stressing the reduction or disappearance of frontline policy discretion, is addressed. Second, the 'enablement thesis' gets attention, highlighting how technologies provide frontline workers and citizens with additional action resources. The article concludes with propositions for a future research agenda on the topic.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U LAUSANNE CH
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB PUBLIC ADM
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT REV ADM SCI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 10 INT RES S PUBL MA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 34 ANN C EUR GROUP P
[6]  
[Anonymous], POLITIQUES MANAGEMEN
[7]   CAUGHT BY SURPRISE? Micro-mobilization, new media and the management of strategic surprises [J].
Bekkers, Victor ;
Edwards, Arthur ;
Moody, Rebecca ;
Beunders, Henri .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 13 (07) :1003-1021
[8]  
Bellamy C., 1998, GOVERNING INFORM AGE
[9]   From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control [J].
Bovens, M ;
Zouridis, S .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (02) :174-184
[10]   Proletarian or promethean? Impacts of automation and program integration on social service workers and their clients [J].
Dennis, Michael Robert .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ETHNOGRAPHY, 2006, 35 (05) :552-582