Women in transition: Changes in gender wage differentials in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union

被引:155
作者
Brainerd, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Williams Coll, Williamstown, MA 01267 USA
来源
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW | 2000年 / 54卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2696036
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Under state socialism, women fared relatively well in the labor market: female-male wage differentials were similar to these in the West, and female labor force participation rates were among the highest in the world. Have these women maintained their relative positions since the introduction of market reforms? The author investigates this question using household surveys from seven formerly socialist countries. The results indicate a consistent increase in female relative wages across Eastern Europe, and a substantial decline in female relative wages in Russia and Ukraine. Women in the latter countries have been penalized by the tremendous widening of the wage distribution in those countries. Increased wage inequality in Eastern Europe has also depressed female relative wages, but these losses have been more than offset by gains in rewards to observed skills and by an apparent decline in discrimination against women.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 162
页数:25
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]  
Kirsch Leonard Joel, 1972, Soviet Wages: Changes in Structure and Administration Since 1956
[42]  
Kornai Janos., 1992, SOCIALIST SYSTEM
[43]  
KRUEGER A.B., 1995, Differences and Changes in Wage Structures, P405
[44]  
MAURERFAZIO M, 1999, UNPUB EFFECT I CHANG
[45]  
MUNICH D, 1999, 272 W DAV I
[46]  
Newell A., 1996, LABOUR ECON, V3, P337
[47]  
Newell A., 1999, ED EC, V7, P67, DOI DOI 10.1080/09645299900000005
[48]  
Newell A, 2000, 305 W DAV I
[49]   The gender earnings differential in the Russian transition economy [J].
Ogloblin, CG .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1999, 52 (04) :602-627
[50]   WINNERS AND LOSERS IN TRANSITION - RETURNS TO EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, AND GENDER IN SLOVENIA [J].
ORAZEM, PF ;
VODOPIVEC, M .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 9 (02) :201-230