Perioperative antibiotics should not be withheld in proven cases of periprosthetic infection

被引:47
作者
Ghanem, Elie
Parvizi, Javad
Clohisy, John
Burnett, Stephen
Sharkey, Peter F.
Barrack, Robert
机构
[1] Rothman Inst Orthoped, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/BLO.0b013e318065b780
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Intraoperative tissue or fluid culture remains the gold standard in diagnosing periprosthetic infection. However, an organism is not always isolated from intraoperative cultures. We asked whether preoperative antibiotics interfered with the isolation of organisms from intraoperative tissue samples. We hypothesized organisms isolated from preoperative joint aspirate correspond to those cultures from intraoperative specimens. We retrospectively reviewed 171 patients undergoing TKA, diagnosed with periprosthetic infections from 2000 to 2005, who had a positive preoperative aspiration culture. The details of any antibiotics given to the patients preoperatively were documented. Seventy-two of 171 patients received preoperative antibiotics before surgery. Intraoperative culture was negative in nine of the 72 patients who received antibiotics: a false-negative rate of 12.5%. An organism could not be isolated from intraoperative samples in eight of the 99 patients who did not receive preoperative antibiotics: a false-negative rate of 8%. We observed no difference in the incidence of false-negative cultures between the two groups. The organisms isolated from the aspirate culture were identical to their intraoperative counterparts in 97% of the cases. Administration of preoperative antibiotics to patients with a positive preoperative joint aspirate did not interfere with the isolation of the infecting organism from intraoperative culture samples more than when antibiotics were withheld.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 47
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Accuracy of joint aspiration for the preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Ali, F ;
Wilkinson, JM ;
Cooper, JR ;
Kerry, RM ;
Hamer, AJ ;
Norman, P ;
Stockley, I .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (02) :221-226
[2]
DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION BY FROZEN-SECTION DURING REVISION ARTHROPLASTY [J].
ATHANASOU, NA ;
PANDEY, R ;
DESTEIGER, R ;
CROOK, D ;
SMITH, PM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (01) :28-33
[3]
Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty [J].
Atkins, BL ;
Athanasou, N ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Crook, DWM ;
Simpson, H ;
Peto, TEA ;
McLardy-Smith, P ;
Berendt, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (10) :2932-2939
[4]
Barrack RL, 1997, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P8
[5]
THE VALUE OF ASPIRATION OF THE HIP-JOINT BEFORE REVISION TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
BARRACK, RL ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (01) :66-76
[6]
Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection [J].
Bauer, TW ;
Parvizi, J ;
Kobayashi, N ;
Krebs, V .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (04) :869-882
[7]
MANAGEMENT OF DEEP INFECTION OF TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT [J].
BUCHHOLZ, HW ;
ELSON, RA ;
ENGELBRECHT, E ;
LODENKAMPER, H ;
ROTTGER, J ;
SIEGEL, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1981, 63 (03) :342-353
[8]
Duff GP, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P132
[9]
FITZGERALD RH, 1992, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V23, P259
[10]
The role of intraoperative frozen section in decision making in revision hip and knee arthroplasties in a local community hospital [J].
Ko, PS ;
Ip, D ;
Chow, KP ;
Cheung, F ;
Lee, OB ;
Lam, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (02) :189-195