Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: from evaluation to treatment

Purpose of review Valve replacement improves symptoms and survival in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, however, is an especially challenging subset as valve replacement has a significant risk, and may fail to alleviate symptoms or improve left ventricular function. This article reviews the potential problems in evaluating aortic stenosis severity in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, the utility of dobutamine challenge to identify patients most likely to benefit from surgery, and the factors predicting patient outcome. Recent findings Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis consists of a heterogeneous group of patients with 'true' severe aortic stenosis, in whom afterload mismatch results from a severely stenotic valve; and 'pseudo-severe' aortic stenosis, I where the valve is only Mildly or moderately stenotic, but appears severe due to limitations in,determining disease severity under low-flow conditions. Valve replacement is likely to benefit the former group, but may have little benefit to the latter. Dobutamine challenge c an distinguish 'true' and 'pseudo-severe' aortic stenosis, and can evaluate contractile reserve, one of the strongest predictors of patient outcome. Strategies to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch should be considered to optimize postoperative outcome. Summary Dobutamine challenge can identify low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis patients most likely to benefit from valve replacement and provides important prognostic information on the operative risks and long-term outcome.