Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review

被引:236
作者
Zhou, P. [1 ]
Wang, M.
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon dioxide (CO2); Emissions allocation; Indicator; Fairness; Efficiency; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-ANALYSIS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; GLOBAL WARMING POLICY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; REGIONAL ALLOCATION; COMPOSITE INDICATORS; FUTURE COMMITMENTS; CO2; EMISSIONS; INITIAL ALLOCATION; SECTORAL APPROACH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions allocation plays a fundamental role in determining reduction responsibility at economy level or emission permits at firm level. Past decades have seen the development and applications of various methods for CO2 emissions allocation. This paper provides a literature review of CO2 emissions allocation with emphasis on the evolution of allocation methods used. It begins with a summary of the most popular allocation principles and criteria that lay a foundation for the development of allocation methods. We then classify the existing allocation methods into four groups, namely indicator, optimization, game theoretic and hybrid approaches. The main features and findings of past studies are identified and summarized. While the fairness principle prevails in earlier studies, the efficiency principle has been found to receive increasing attention recently. We also present a comparison of the empirical results based on ten popular indicator methods to show how indicator choice affects the allocation results. Issues related to selecting appropriate methods in CO2 emissions allocation are finally discussed. Further research may be carried out to strike a balance between fairness and efficiency so that the allocation results become more widely acceptable and economically feasible. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 59
页数:13
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Agarwal A., 1991, GLOBAL WARMING UNEQU
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, Environ. Polit., DOI [DOI 10.1080/09644019708414340, DOI 10.1080/]
  • [3] Economics and distribution in the greenhouse
    Azar, C
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2000, 47 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [4] Climate change - Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility
    Baer, P
    Harte, J
    Haya, B
    Herzog, AV
    Holdren, J
    Hultman, NE
    Kammen, DM
    Norgaard, RB
    Raymond, L
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5488) : 2287 - 2287
  • [5] Greenhouse Development Rights: towards an equitable framework for global climate policy
    Baer, Paul
    Fieldman, Glenn
    Athanasiou, Tom
    Kartha, Sivan
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2008, 21 (04) : 649 - 669
  • [6] The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions
    Bastianoni, S
    Pulselli, FM
    Tiezzi, E
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 49 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [7] THE EQUITABLE INTERNATIONAL ALLOCATION OF TRADABLE CARBON EMISSION PERMITS
    BECKERMAN, W
    PASEK, J
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1995, 5 (05): : 405 - 413
  • [8] Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?
    Berk, Marcel M.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2001, 1 (04) : 465 - 480
  • [10] Bode Sven, 2004, EUROPEAN ENV, V14, P300, DOI DOI 10.1002/EET.359