Transcript and protein expression profiles of the NCI-60 cancer cell panel: an integromic microarray study

被引:257
作者
Shankavaram, Uma T.
Reinhold, William C.
Nishizuka, Satoshi
Major, Sylvia
Morita, Daisaku
Chary, Krishna K.
Reimers, Mark A.
Scherf, Uwe
Kahn, Ari
Dolginow, Douglas
Cossman, Jeffrey
Kaldjian, Eric P.
Scudiero, Dominic A.
Petricoin, Emanuel
Liotta, Lance
Lee, Jae K.
Weinstein, John N. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Genom & Bioinformat Grp, Mol Pharmacol Lab, Ctr Canc Res,NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Informat Technol, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[3] Gene Log Inc, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[4] NCI, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, Sci Applicat Int Corp, Frederick, MD 21701 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, Manassas, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0650
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To evaluate the utility of transcript profiling for prediction of protein expression levels, we compared profiles across the NCl-60 cancer cell panel, which represents nine tissues of origin. For that analysis, we present here two new NCl-60 transcript profile data sets (A based on Affymetrix HG-U95 and HG-U133A chips; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and one new protein profile data set (based on reverse-phase protein lysate arrays). The data sets are available online at http://discover.nci.nih.gov in the CelllMiner program package. Using the new transcript data in combination with our previously published cDNA array and Affymetrix HU6800 data sets, we first developed a "consensus set" of transcript profiles based on the four different microarray platforms. Using that set, we found that 65% of the genes showed statistically significant transcript-protein correlation, and the correlations were generally higher than those reported previously for panels of mammalian cells. Using the predictive analysis of microarray nearest shrunken centroid algorithm for functional prediction of tissue of origin, we then found that (a) the consensus mRNA set did better than did data from any of the individual mRNA platforms and (b) the protein data seemed to do somewhat better (P = 0.027) on a gene-for-gene basis in this particular study than did the consensus mRNA data, but both did well. Analysis based on the Gene Ontology showed protein levels of structure-related genes to be well predicted by mRNA levels (mean r = 0.71). Because the transcript-based technologies are more mature and are currently able to assess larger numbers of genes at one time, they continue to be useful, even when the ultimate aim is information about proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 832
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[41]  
Zhou Y, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P1688