Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

被引:1550
作者
Van Cutsem, Eric
Peeters, Marc
Siena, Salvatore
Humblet, Yves
Hendlisz, Alain
Neyns, Bart
Canon, Jean-Luc
Van Laethem, Jean-Luc
Maurel, Joan
Richardson, Gary
Wolf, Michael
Amado, Rafael G.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Digest Oncol Unit, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Inst Jules Bordet, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[5] AZ Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Erasme Univ Hosp, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[7] Ctr Hosp Nottre Dame & Reine Fabiola, Charleroi, Belgium
[8] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Milan, Italy
[9] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Cabrini Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR). We compared the activity of panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC) to that of BSC alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed after standard chemotherapy. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 463 patients with 1% or more EGFR tumor cell membrane staining, measurable disease, and radiologic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months of most recent chemotherapy to panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus BSC (n = 231) or BSC alone ( n = 232). Tumor assessments by blinded central review were scheduled from week 8 until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response, overall survival ( OS), and safety. BSC patients who progressed could receive panitumumab in a cross-over study. Results Panitumumab significantly prolonged PFS ( hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.66, [ P <.0001]). Median PFS time was 8 weeks ( 95% CI, 7.9 to 8.4) for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks ( 95% CI, 7.1 to 7.7) for BSC. Mean ( standard error) PFS time was 13.8 (0.8) weeks for panitumumab and 8.5 (0.5) weeks for BSC. Objective response rates also favored panitumumab over BSC; after a 12-month minimum follow-up, response rates were 10% for panitumumab and 0% for BSC ( P <.0001). No difference was observed in OS ( HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.22), which was confounded by similar activity of panitumumab after 76% of BSC patients entered the cross-over study. Panitumumab was well tolerated. Skin toxicities, hypomagnesaemia, and diarrhea were the most common toxicities observed. No patients had grade 3/4 infusion reactions. Conclusion Panitumumab significantly improved PFS with manageable toxicity in patients with chemorefractory colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1664
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
André, T ;
Louvet, C ;
Maindrault-Goebel, F ;
Couteau, C ;
Mabro, M ;
Lotz, JP ;
Gilles-Amar, V ;
Krulik, M ;
Carola, E ;
Izrael, V ;
de Gramont, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 (09) :1343-1347
[2]  
BERLIN J, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P3548, DOI DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.24.18_SUPPL.3548
[3]  
BOEDIGHEIMER M, 2005, P AM ASS CANC RES AN
[4]   A CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL FOR THE MEDIAN SURVIVAL-TIME [J].
BROOKMEYER, R ;
CROWLEY, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :29-41
[5]   Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Humblet, Y ;
Siena, S ;
Khayat, D ;
Bleiberg, H ;
Santoro, A ;
Bets, D ;
Mueser, M ;
Harstrick, A ;
Verslype, C ;
Chau, I ;
Van Cutsem, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (04) :337-345
[6]   Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Pyrhönen, S ;
James, RD ;
Punt, CJA ;
Hickish, TF ;
Heikkila, R ;
Johannesen, TB ;
Starkhammar, H ;
Topham, CA ;
Awad, L ;
Jacques, C ;
Herait, P .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) :1413-1418
[7]   Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer [J].
de Gramont, A ;
Figer, A ;
Seymour, M ;
Homerin, M ;
Hmissi, A ;
Cassidy, J ;
Boni, C ;
Cortes-Funes, H ;
Cervantes, A ;
Freyer, G ;
Papamichael, D ;
Le Bail, N ;
Louvet, C ;
Hendler, D ;
de Braud, F ;
Wilson, C ;
Morvan, F ;
Bonetti, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (16) :2938-2947
[8]   Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial [J].
Douillard, JY ;
Cunningham, D ;
Roth, AD ;
Navarro, M ;
James, RD ;
Karasek, P ;
Jandik, P ;
Iveson, T ;
Carmichael, J ;
Alakl, M ;
Gruia, G ;
Awad, L ;
Rougier, P .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9209) :1041-1047
[9]   Preclinical and clinical evaluations of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody [J].
Foon, KA ;
Yang, XD ;
Weiner, LM ;
Belldegrun, AS ;
Figlin, RA ;
Crawford, J ;
Rowinsky, EK ;
Dutcher, JP ;
Vogelzang, NJ ;
Gollub, J ;
Thompson, JA ;
Schwartz, G ;
Bukowski, RM ;
Roskos, LK ;
Schwab, GM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (03) :984-990
[10]  
FORD SK, 2006, P AM ASS CANC RES WA