Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting-incidence and impact on patient quality of life at community oncology settings

被引:257
作者
Cohen, Lorenzo
de Moor, Carl A.
Eisenberg, Peter
Ming, Eileen E.
Hu, Henry
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Boston, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Calif Canc Care, Greenbrae, CA 94904 USA
[5] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA 19486 USA
关键词
nausea; vomiting; quality of life; chemotherapy; cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-006-0173-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Goals of work: The present study sought to determine the prevalence of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) across ten community oncology settings. The effect of CINV on quality of life (QOL) was also evaluated. Materials and methods: Cancer patients who were scheduled for their first cycle of a new chemotherapy regimen were recruited from ten community oncology clinics. Study participants recorded occurrence of CINV by completing a daily diary each day for the first 8 days after treatment during each cycle and the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) before chemotherapy, at the end of day 1 and day 6 after chemotherapy. Mixed model regression analysis was used to explore the association between occurrence of CINV at cycle 1 and subsequent cycles and its impact on patient QOL. Main results: One hundred and fifty-one patients provided information for at least one cycle. During cycle 1, only 33% had neither acute nor delayed CINV. Of the 36% patients who developed acute CINV, 8% developed acute CINV only. Of the 59% who developed delayed CINV, 53% reported delayed only and 47% reported acute and delayed CINV. A similar pattern was seen at cycles 2 and 3. Experience of CINV at cycle 1 was associated with the development of CINV at cycles 2 and 3. Occurrence of CINV significantly interfered with patient QOL as assessed by the FLIE. Conclusions: CINV remained a substantial problem for patients receiving chemotherapy in this community-based sample, especially delayed CINV. CINV significantly interfered with patient QOL and daily functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 503
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Ann Oncol, V5, P585
[2]  
BLOWER PR, 1990, EUR J CANCER, V26, pS8
[3]   Ondansetron Compared with High-Dose Metoclopramide in Prophylaxis of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting - A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study [J].
Demulder, PHM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Vermorken, JB ;
Vanliessum, PA ;
Molsjevdevic, S ;
Allman, EL ;
Beranek, P ;
Verweij, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (11) :834-840
[4]  
Dibble Suzanne L, 2003, Oncol Nurs Forum, V30, pE40, DOI 10.1188/03.ONF.E40-E47
[5]  
GANDARA DR, 1991, EUR J CANCER, V27, pS9
[6]  
GANDARA DR, 1992, SEMIN ONCOL, V19, P67
[7]   Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines [J].
Gralla, RJ ;
Osoba, D ;
Kris, MG ;
Kirkbride, P ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Chinnery, LW ;
Clark-Snow, R ;
Gill, DP ;
Groshen, S ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, JM ;
Morrow, GR ;
Perez, EA ;
Silber, JH ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2971-2994
[8]  
Griffin AM, 1996, ANN ONCOL, V7, P189
[9]   Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics - Perception versus reality [J].
Grunberg, SM ;
Deuson, RR ;
Mavros, P ;
Geling, O ;
Hansen, M ;
Cruciani, G ;
Daniele, B ;
De Pouvourville, G ;
Rubenstein, EB ;
Daugaard, G .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (10) :2261-2268
[10]   A randomized, double-blind comparison of single dose and divided multiple dose dolasetron for cisplatin induced emesis [J].
Harman, GS ;
Omura, GA ;
Ryan, K ;
Hainsworth, JD ;
Cramer, MB ;
Hahne, WF .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 38 (04) :323-328