Assessing the eco-environmental performance of agricultural production in OECD countries: the use of nitrogen flows and balance

被引:32
作者
Hoang, Viet-Ngu [1 ]
Alauddin, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Agricultural production; Eco-environmental performance; Farm gate; OECD; Nitrogen balance; Nutrient auditing; Soil system; Soil surface; NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT; BUDGETS; SYSTEM; SCALES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10705-010-9343-y
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Nitrogen balance is increasingly used as an indicator of the environmental performance of agricultural sector in national, international, and global contexts. There are three main methods of accounting the national nitrogen balance: farm gate, soil surface, and soil system. Some studies have provided the comparison among these methods and the conclusion is mixed. The present paper combines these three methods to provide a more detailed auditing of the nitrogen flows and balance. The proposed combination gives more useful information than the individual methods do, especially for the use of nitrogen flows and balance in international comparison of environmental performance. The study investigated the nitrogen flows and balance of OECD countries for years from 1985 to 2003 and used different indicators to assess relative environmental performance of these countries. Some important findings emerge from the empirical exercise. First, on the whole OECD countries had decreased their nitrogen surplus by around 10% between 1990 and 2003. Secondly, OECD nitrogen surplus intensity was still higher than the world level. Thirdly, the environmental performance in the crop sector was better than the livestock sector. Fourthly, the performance varied greatly among member countries and these differences were correlated with many factors such as the use of land and domestic support. Fifthly, the rankings varied depending on the indicators used.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 368
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], 1973, REV INCOME WEALTH
  • [12] [Anonymous], 2001, FOOD BAL SHEETS HDB
  • [13] [Anonymous], 2007, GROSS NITR BAL HDB, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00067-4
  • [14] De Walle F.B., 1998, Agriculture and the environment: minerals, manure and measures
  • [15] Eggleston H.S., 2006, 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES
  • [16] FAO, 2001, FOOD BAL SHEETS HDB
  • [17] Nutrient budgeting as an approach to improving nutrient management on Australian dairy farms
    Gourley, C. J. P.
    Powell, J. M.
    Dougherty, W. J.
    Weaver, D. M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2007, 47 (09) : 1064 - 1074
  • [18] Janssen BH, 1999, NUTRIENT DISEQUILIBRIA IN AGROECOSYSTEMS: CONCEPTS AND CASE STUDIES, P27
  • [19] Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies
    Oenema, O
    Kros, H
    de Vries, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 20 (1-2) : 3 - 16
  • [20] The Dutch mineral accounting system and the European nitrate directive: implications for N and P management and farm performance
    Ondersteijn, CJM
    Beldman, ACG
    Daatselaar, CHG
    Giesen, GWJ
    Huirne, RBM
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 92 (2-3) : 283 - 296