Adherence to cervical screening in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination: how low is too low?

被引:23
作者
Bauch, Chris T. [1 ]
Li, Meng [2 ]
Chapman, Gretchen [2 ]
Galvani, Alison P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Math & Stat, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] State Univ New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
NATURAL-HISTORY MODEL; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HPV INFECTION; CANCER; PROGRAMS; VACCINES; DISEASE; CANADA; IMPACT; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70004-9
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Human papillomavirus vaccine prevents infection by two major oncogenic types of the virus. Continued screening is needed in vaccinated women to prevent cancers caused by high-risk types not included in the vaccine. An exaggerated sense of protection from the vaccine could lead to a decline in the rate of screening among vaccinated women, which in principle could lead to an increase in the incidence of cervical cancer. We present a simple mathematical model of vaccination, screening, and disease incidence, including an analysis of the effect of data uncertainties. For a population with opportunistic screening and 30% vaccine coverage, screening rates in vaccinated women would have to decline by at least 80% (median value of probabilistic uncertainty analysis) before the incidence of cervical cancer would increase in the era since the introduction of the vaccine. By comparison, the decline needed is at least 49% in a population with organised screening and 70% vaccine coverage. In populations that have highly effective cervical screening programmes, incidence of cervical cancer starts to increase after smaller, but still substantial, decreases in screening. Introduction of vaccine is unlikely to lead to an increased incidence of cervical cancer as a result of diminished screening.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 137
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   Modelling the impact of HPV vaccines on cervical cancer and screening programmes [J].
Garnett, Geoffrey P. ;
Kim, Jane J. ;
French, Katherine ;
Goldie, Sue J. .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 :178-186
[12]   Role of herd immunity in determining the effect of vaccines against sexually transmitted disease [J].
Garnett, GP .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 191 :S97-S106
[13]  
*GAVI ALL, 2009, WHICH VACC INV GAVIS
[14]  
GOLDHABERFIEBER.J, 2006, 28 ANN M SOC MED DEC
[15]   Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine [J].
Goldie, SJ ;
Kohli, M ;
Grima, D ;
Weinstein, MC ;
Wright, TC ;
Bosch, FX ;
Franco, E .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (08) :604-615
[16]   A comprehensive natural history model of HPV infection and cervical cancer to estimate the clinical impact of a prophylactic HPV-16/18 vaccine [J].
Goldie, SJ ;
Grima, D ;
Kohli, M ;
Wright, TC ;
Weinstein, M ;
Franco, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 106 (06) :896-904
[17]   Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening [J].
Goldie, Sue J. ;
Kim, Jane J. ;
Myers, Evan .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 :164-170
[18]   Sustained efficacy up to 4-5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial [J].
Harper, DM ;
Franco, EL ;
Wheeler, CM ;
Moscicki, AB ;
Romonowski, B ;
Roteli-Martins, CM ;
Jenkins, D ;
Schuind, A ;
Clemens, SAC ;
Dubin, G .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9518) :1247-1255
[19]   Progression and regression of incident cervical HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 infections in young women [J].
Insinga R.P. ;
Dasbach E.J. ;
Elbasha E.H. ;
Liaw K.-L. ;
Barr E. .
Infectious Agents and Cancer, 2 (1)
[20]  
Insinga RP, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P355