Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks

被引:53
作者
Carroll, JF
Klun, JA
Debboun, M
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, APDL, Chem Affecting Insect Behav Lab,Beltsville Agr Re, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] USA, Ctr Hlth Promot & Prevent Med S, Ft McPherson, GA USA
关键词
Amblyomma americanum; Ixodes scapularis; blacklegged tick; deet; fingertip bioassay; lone star tick; N; N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide; SS220; (1S; 2; S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide;
D O I
10.1111/j.0269-283X.2005.00559.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say and lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus) (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide (SS220) were studied using fingertip laboratory bioassays. Ethanol solutions of both compounds applied to the skin strongly repelled both species of ticks at 0.8 and 1.6 mumole of compound/cm(2) skin. The ticks were also repelled when two layers of organdie cloth covered the portion of a finger treated with either deet or SS220. Gas chromatographic analyses of the outer layer of cloth that had covered skin treated with 1.6 mumole compound/cm(2) skin revealed only 0.1 nmole SS220/cm(2) cloth and 2.8 nmole deet/cm(2) cloth. However, in bioassays in which a single layer of cloth was treated with a dose of deet or SS220 equivalent to the amount found in the outer layer of cloth, ticks were not repelled. Results unequivocally demonstrated that these ticks responded to the repellents in the vapour phase when repellent treated skin was covered with cloth to obviate tactile contact with them, and made it clear that the ticks detect the repellents by olfactory sensing. Heretofore, the mode of action of deet and SS220 was unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Comparative activity of deet and AI3-37220 repellents against the ticks Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) in laboratory bioassays [J].
Carroll, JF ;
Solberg, VB ;
Klun, JA ;
Kramer, M ;
Debboun, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2004, 41 (02) :249-254
[2]  
CDC, 2002, LYM DIS
[3]   Test systems for tick repellents [J].
Dautel, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 293 :182-188
[4]  
Dautel H, 1999, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V91, P431, DOI 10.1023/A:1003674208992
[5]   EHRLICHIAL DISEASES OF HUMANS - EMERGING TICK-BORNE INFECTIONS [J].
DUMLER, JS ;
BAKKEN, JS .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 20 (05) :1102-1110
[6]   COMPARATIVE FIELD-EVALUATION OF PERMETHRIN AND DEET-TREATED MILITARY UNIFORMS FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION AGAINST TICKS (ACARI) [J].
EVANS, SR ;
KORCH, GW ;
LAWSON, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1990, 27 (05) :829-834
[7]   Synthesis and repellent efficacy of a new chiral piperidine analog:: Comparison with Deet and Bayrepel activity in human-volunteer laboratory assays against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi [J].
Klun, JA ;
Khrimian, A ;
Margaryan, K ;
Kramer, M ;
Debboun, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2003, 40 (03) :293-299
[8]   EFFICACY OF PERMETHRIN AS A REPELLENT AND TOXICANT FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION AGAINST THE PACIFIC COAST TICK AND THE PAJAROELLO TICK (ACARI, IXODIDAE AND ARGASIDAE) [J].
LANE, RS ;
ANDERSON, JR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1984, 21 (06) :692-702
[9]   In vitro assays for repellents and deterrents for ticks:: differing effects of products when tested with attractant or arrestment stimuli [J].
McMhon, C ;
Kröber, T ;
Guerin, PM .
MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :370-378
[10]   PRESSURIZED SPRAYS OF PERMETHRIN AND DEET ON CLOTHING FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION AGAINST THE LONE STAR TICK AND THE AMERICAN DOG TICK (ACARI, IXODIDAE) [J].
MOUNT, GA ;
SNODDY, EL .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1983, 76 (03) :529-531