Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard

被引:117
作者
Tseng, Ming-Lang [1 ]
机构
[1] MingDao Univ, Dept Business Innovat & Dev, Pitou 52345, Changhua, Taiwan
关键词
Evaluation methodologies; Interdisciplinary projects; Analytic network process; DEMATEL; Fuzzy set theory; Balanced scorecard; DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; DEMATEL; SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a multi-criteria evaluation concept that highlights the importance of performance measurement However, although there is an abundance of literature on the BSC framework, there is a scarcity of literature regarding how the framework with dependence and interactive relationships should be properly implemented in uncertainty. This study proposes a hybrid approach: the analytic network process (ANP) is used to analyze the dependence aspects, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is used to deal with the interactive criteria, and the fuzzy set theory is used to evaluate the uncertainty The four BSC aspects and 22 criteria are evaluated for a private university of science and technology in Taiwan The results show that student acquisition is the most influential and weighty criterion, and the annual growth in revenue is the most effective criterion. Managerial implications are also discussed, and concluding remarks are made. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 201
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making [J].
Al-Najjar, B ;
Alsyouf, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 84 (01) :85-100
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FUZZY LOGIC NEUROFUZ
[3]   SENSITIVITY, PRECISION, AND LINEAR AGGREGATION OF SIGNALS FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION [J].
BANKER, RD ;
DATAR, SM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (01) :21-39
[4]   Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement [J].
Bremser, WG ;
Barsky, NP .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (03) :229-238
[5]   Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard [J].
Cebeci, Ufuk .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (05) :8900-8909
[6]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[7]   Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations [J].
Chen, SM .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 77 (03) :265-276
[8]   Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation [J].
Cheng, CH ;
Lin, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) :174-186
[9]  
Dalton D., 2003, PHARM EXEC, V23, P84
[10]   GROUP DECISION SUPPORT WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, RF ;
FORMAN, EH .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1992, 8 (02) :99-124