Rigorous Born approximation and beyond for the spin-boson model

被引:98
作者
DiVincenzo, DP
Loss, D
机构
[1] IBM Corp, Div Res, TJ Watson Res Ctr, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Phys & Astron, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[3] CALTECH, Inst Quantum Informat, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Theoret Phys, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW B | 2005年 / 71卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035318
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Within the lowest-order Born approximation, we present an exact calculation of the time dynamics of the spin-boson model in the Ohmic regime. We observe non-Markovian effects at zero temperature that scale with the system-bath coupling strength and cause qualitative changes in the evolution of coherence at intermediate times of order of the oscillation period. These changes could significantly affect the performance of these systems as qubits. In the biased case, we find a prompt loss of coherence at these intermediate times, whose decay rate is set by rootalpha, where alpha is the coupling strength to the environment. We also explore the calculation of the next-order Born approximation: we show that, at the expense of very large computational complexity, interesting physical quantities can be rigorously computed at fourth order using computer algebra, presented completely in an accompanying MATHEMATICA file. We compute the O(alpha) corrections to the long time behavior of the system density matrix; the result is identical to the reduced density matrix of the equilibrium state to the same order in alpha. All these calculations indicate precision experimental tests that could confirm or refute the validity of the spin-boson model in a variety of systems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Universality of decoherence [J].
Braun, D ;
Haake, F ;
Strunz, WT .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 86 (14) :2913-2917
[2]   COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT MARKOV APPROXIMATIONS FOR OPEN SPIN SYSTEMS [J].
CELIO, M ;
LOSS, D .
PHYSICA A, 1989, 158 (03) :769-783
[3]   DYNAMICS OF THE 2-STATE SYSTEM WITH OHMIC DISSIPATION [J].
CHAKRAVARTY, S ;
LEGGETT, AJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1984, 52 (01) :5-8
[4]   Coherent quantum dynamics of a superconducting flux qubit [J].
Chiorescu, I ;
Nakamura, Y ;
Harmans, CJPM ;
Mooij, JE .
SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5614) :1869-1871
[5]   Quantum computers and quantum coherence [J].
DiVincenzo, DP ;
Loss, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 1999, 200 (1-3) :202-218
[6]   Crossover from coherent to incoherent dynamics in damped quantum systems [J].
Egger, R ;
Grabert, H ;
Weiss, U .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1997, 55 (04) :R3809-R3812
[7]   Driven quantum tunneling [J].
Grifoni, M ;
Hanggi, P .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1998, 304 (5-6) :229-354
[8]   Zeeman energy and spin relaxation in a one-electron quantum dot [J].
Hanson, R ;
Witkamp, B ;
Vandersypen, LMK ;
van Beveren, LHW ;
Elzerman, JM ;
Kouwenhoven, LP .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 91 (19)
[9]   Real-time renormalization-group analysis of the dynamics of the spin-boson model [J].
Keil, M ;
Schoeller, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2001, 63 (18)
[10]   DYNAMICS OF THE DISSIPATIVE 2-STATE SYSTEM [J].
LEGGETT, AJ ;
CHAKRAVARTY, S ;
DORSEY, AT ;
FISHER, MPA ;
GARG, A ;
ZWERGER, W .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1987, 59 (01) :1-85