A legitimate paradox: Neo-liberal reform and the return of the state in Korea

被引:39
作者
Hundt, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Polit Sci & Int Studies, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0022038042000309232
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxicaliy, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 260
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   The Asian debt-and-development crisis of 1997?: Causes and consequences [J].
Wade, R .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 26 (08) :1535-1553
[42]  
Wade R., 1990, GOVERNING MARKET, DOI 10.2307/j.ctv346sp7
[43]  
WEISS L, 2000, POLITICS MARKETS WAK
[44]  
Weiss L., 2003, STATES GLOBAL EC BRI
[45]   What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus? [J].
Williamson, J .
WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 2000, 15 (02) :251-264
[46]  
YOON HS, 2003, HANGUK JEONGCHI EOTT
[47]  
YU YE, 1999, SHINDONGA
[48]  
Yun M., 2003, EC CRISIS CORPORATE
[49]  
YUN YH, 1999, SHINDONGA
[50]  
2004, ECONOMIST 0228