The role of low-fat diets in body weight control:: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies

被引:292
作者
Astrup, A
Grunwald, GK
Melanson, EL
Saris, WHM
Hill, JO
机构
[1] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Res Dept Human Nutr, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, LMC, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Human Nutr, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
low-fat diets; weight loss; obesity; humans; body weight regulation;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ijo.0801453
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Low-fat high-carbohydrate diets are recommended to prevent weight gain in normal weight subjects and reduce body weight in overweight and obese. However, their efficacy is controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of ad libitum low-fat diets in reducing body weight in non-diabetic individuals from the results of intervention trials. DESIGN: Studies were identified from a computerized search of the Medline database from January 1966 to July 1999 and other sources. Inclusion criteria were controlled trials lasting more than 2 months comparing ad libitum low-fat diets as the sole intervention with a control group consuming habitual diet or a medium-fat diet ad libitum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in changes in dietary fat intake, energy intake and body weight. Weighted mean differences for continuous data and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) were calculated. RESULTS: Two authors independently selected the studies meeting the inclusion criteria and extracted data from 16 trials (duration of 2-12 months) with 19 intervention groups, enrolling 1910 individuals, Fourteen were randomized. Weight loss was not the primary aim in 11 studies. Before the interventions the mean proportions of dietary energy from fat in the studies were 37.7% (95% Cl, 36.9-38.5) in the low-fat groups, and 37.4% (36.4-38.4) in the control groups. The low-fat intervention produced a mean fat reduction of 10.2% (8.1-12.3). Low-fat intervention groups showed a greater weight loss than control groups (3.2kg, 95% confidence interval 1.9-4.5 kg; P <0.0001). and a greater reduction in energy intake 1138 kJ/day, 95% confidence interval 564-1712 kJ/day, P= 0.002). Having a body weight 10 kg higher than the average pre-treatment body weight was associated with a 2.6 +/- 0.8 kg (P= 0.011) greater difference in weight loss. CONCLUSION: A reduction in dietary fat without intentional restriction of energy intake causes weight loss, which is more substantial in heavier subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1552
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Changes in diet and physical activity affect the body mass index of Chinese adults
    Paeratakul, S
    Popkin, BM
    Keyou, G
    Adair, LS
    Stevens, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 1998, 22 (05) : 424 - 431
  • [22] Pi-Sunyer FX, 1998, OBES RES, V6, p51S
  • [23] PRENTICE AM, 1986, BRIT MED J, V292, P983, DOI 10.1136/bmj.292.6526.983
  • [24] Pritchard JE, 1996, INT J OBESITY, V20, P513
  • [25] RABEN A, 1995, INT J OBESITY, V19, P916
  • [26] Comparison of self-report of reduced fat and salt foods with sales and supply data
    Radimer, KL
    Harvey, PWJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1998, 52 (05) : 380 - 382
  • [27] SANDSTROM B, 1992, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V46, P95
  • [28] Randomized controlled trial of changes in dietary carbohydrate/fat ratio and simple vs complex carbohydrates on body weight and blood lipids:: the CARMEN study
    Saris, WHM
    Astrup, A
    Prentice, AM
    Zunft, HJF
    Formiguera, X
    Verboeket-van de Venne, WPHG
    Raben, A
    Poppitt, SD
    Seppelt, B
    Johnston, S
    Vasilaras, TH
    Keogh, GF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2000, 24 (10) : 1310 - 1318
  • [29] BODY-WEIGHT AND LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL CHANGES AFTER CONSUMPTION OF A LOW-FAT AD-LIBITUM DIET
    SCHAEFER, EJ
    LICHTENSTEIN, AH
    LAMONFAVA, S
    MCNAMARA, JR
    SCHAEFER, MM
    RASMUSSEN, H
    ORDOVAS, JM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (18): : 1450 - 1455
  • [30] SCHOELLER DA, 1990, NUTR REV, V48, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1990.tb02882.x