Food and processing residues in California: Resource assessment and potential for power generation

被引:53
作者
Matteson, Gary C. [1 ]
Jenkins, B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
biomass; bioenergy; anaerobic; thermochemical; food;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.031
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The California agricultural industry produces more than 350 commodities with a combined yearly value in excess of $28 billion. The processing of many of these crops results in the production of residue streams, and the food processing industry faces increasing regulatory pressure to reduce environmental impacts and provide for sustainable management and use. Surveys of food and other processing and waste management sectors combined with published state data yield a total resource in excess of 4 million metric tons of dry matter, with nearly half of this likely to be available for utilization. About two-thirds of the available resource is produced as high-moisture residues that could support 134 MW, of power generation by anaerobic digestion and other conversion techniques. The other third is generated as low-moisture materials, many of which are already employed as fuel in direct combustion biomass power plants. The cost of energy conversion remains high for biochemical systems, with tipping or disposal fees of the order of $30-50 Mg-1 required to align power costs with current market prices. Identifying ways to reduce capital and operating costs of energy conversion, extending operating seasons to increase capacity factors through centralizing facilities, combining resource streams, and monetizing environmental benefits remain important goals for restructuring food and processing waste management in the state. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3098 / 3105
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
JENKINS BM, 1985, ENERGY BIOMASS WASTE, V9
[12]  
JENKINS BM, 1993, BIOMASS ENERGY FUNDA, V2, P94304
[13]  
JENKINS BM, 2005, BIOMASS CALIFORNIA C
[14]  
Kaufman S. M., 2004, BioCycle, V45, P31
[15]  
LEE W, 2004, SUMMARY 2002 2003 ES
[16]  
MANN MK, 2001, CLEAN PROD PROCESSES, P83
[17]  
MARTIN M, 2005, COMMUNICATION
[18]  
MATTESON GC, 2003, FINAL REPORT CITY DA
[19]  
MATTESON GC, 2005, FOOD RESIDUALS SURVE
[20]  
MCOUAT W, 2004, PROPOSED DIGESTER PR