Prostate cancer characteristics and prostate specific antigen changes in screening detected patients initially treated with a watchful waiting policy

被引:12
作者
de Vries, SH
Raaijmakers, R
Kranse, R
Blijenberg, BG
Schröder, FH
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Chem, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Comprehens Canc, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate; adenocarcinoma; prostate-specific antigen; mass screening; patient selection;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000140958.31366.9f
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated prostate cancer (PCa) characteristics at diagnosis and changes in prostatic specific antigen (PSA) with time in males with screening detected PCa that was initially managed with a watchful waiting policy. Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically proven PCa and PSA less than 10 ng/ml were selected from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam. The choice of initiating a watchful waiting policy was patient desire or physician advice. PSA slope and PSA doubling time (PSADT) were calculated in patients with 3 or more PSA tests results available. Results: A total of 191 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 69 years and mean PSA was 3.9 ng/ml. Of the patients 92.6% had a Gleason score of 3 + 3 or lower, 133 had a followup of greater than 12 months (mean 40) and 35 (29.2%) had a negative PSA slope. Mean PSADT was 9.7 years (range 0.3 to 155) in 85 males with a positive PSA slope. During followup 30 patients changed therapy. Conclusions: Watchful waiting remains a controversial prostate cancer treatment strategy. In select screening detected patients with PCa there appears to be a subgroup with stable or even decreasing PSA values with time. These males could profit from a watchful waiting policy with possible deferred treatment. Together with conventional tumor parameters at diagnosis PSADT and PSA slope during followup could be used to monitor tumor activity and possibly aid in determining the time of deferred treatment. Further followup is mandatory to validate these results.
引用
收藏
页码:2193 / 2196
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland) [J].
Auvinen, A ;
Määttänen, L ;
Stenman, UH ;
Tammela, T ;
Rannikko, S ;
Aro, J ;
Juusela, H ;
Hakama, M .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (03) :279-285
[2]   Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results [J].
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC ;
Landis, P ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1231-1234
[3]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[4]   Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[5]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Cote, K ;
Loffredo, M ;
Schultz, D ;
Chen, MH ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Wein, A ;
Richie, JP .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (02) :281-286
[6]   Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer [J].
Draisma, G ;
Boer, R ;
Otto, SJ ;
van der Cruijsen, IW ;
Damhuis, RAM ;
Schröder, FH ;
de Koning, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) :868-878
[7]  
Egawa S, 1999, CANCER, V86, P463
[8]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[9]   Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Eskew, LA ;
Bare, RL ;
McCullough, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :199-202
[10]  
Etzioni R, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P981