MACULAR DYSFUNCTION IS COMMON IN BOTH TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS WITHOUT MACULAR EDEMA

被引:32
作者
De Benedetto, Umberto [1 ]
Querques, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ]
Lattanzio, Rosangela [1 ]
Borrelli, Enrico [1 ]
Triolo, Giacinto [1 ]
Maestranzi, Gisella [1 ]
Calori, Giliola [3 ]
Querques, Lea [1 ]
Bandello, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Ophthalmol, San Raffaele Sci Inst, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Paris Est Creteil, Dept Ophthalmol, Ctr Hosp Intercommunal Creteil, Creteil, France
[3] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Epidemiol Unit, I-20132 Milan, Italy
来源
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES | 2014年 / 34卷 / 11期
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FUNCTION; RETINAL SENSITIVITY; RETINOPATHY; MICROPERIMETRY; DEGENERATION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0000000000000205
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study retinal function in asymptomatic Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and no clinical signs of diabetic macular edema. Methods: Thirty-six consecutive Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and no diabetic macular edema and 28 healthy controls underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Results: Seventy-one eyes (17 patients with Type 1 and 19 with Type 2 diabetes) were tested, and data from 36 (17 Type 1 and 19 Type 2) eyes were analyzed. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.00 +/- 0.01 logMAR and 0.00 +/- 0.02 logMAR for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.075). Mean central foveal thickness was 234.5 +/- 13.7 mm and 256.3 +/- 12.7 mm for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.04); the central foveal thickness was statistically different compared with the control groups (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mean retinal sensitivity was 18.9 +/- 0.5 dB and 17.7 +/- 0.4 dB for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively; it was statistically different compared with control groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: We demonstrated a significantly reduced sensitivity in both nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy groups without diabetic macular edema compared with healthy controls; this reduction was greater in Type 2 diabetic patients. Central foveal thickness was increased in all diabetic patients compared with healthy controls, despite the absence of diabetic macular edema.
引用
收藏
页码:2171 / 2177
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, V21, P149
[2]  
Antcliff R J, 1999, Semin Ophthalmol, V14, P223, DOI 10.3109/08820539909069541
[3]   A new view of diabetic retinopathy: a neurodegenerative disease of the eye [J].
Barber, AJ .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 27 (02) :283-290
[4]  
BRESNICK GH, 1986, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V93, P989
[5]   Test-Retest Variability of Microperimetry Using the Nidek MP1 in Patients with Macular Disease [J].
Chen, Fred K. ;
Patel, Praveen J. ;
Xing, Wen ;
Bunce, Catey ;
Egan, Catherine ;
Tufail, Adnan T. ;
Coffey, Peter J. ;
Rubin, Gary S. ;
Da Cruz, Lyndon .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (07) :3464-3472
[6]   Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema - Pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies [J].
Ciulla, TA ;
Amador, AG ;
Zinman, B .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (09) :2653-2664
[7]  
Demir M, 2013, J OPHTHALMOL, P767
[8]   Relation between macular morphology and visual function in patients with choroidal neovascularisation of age related macular degeneration [J].
Doris, N ;
Hart, PM ;
Chakravarthy, U ;
McCleland, J ;
Stevenson, M ;
Hudson, C ;
Jackson, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (02) :184-188
[9]   MACULAR EDEMA AND CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA [J].
FINE, BS ;
BRUCKER, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1981, 92 (04) :466-481
[10]   Expression of acute-phase response proteins in retinal Muller cells in diabetes [J].
Gerhardinger, C ;
Costa, MB ;
Coulombe, MC ;
Toth, I ;
Hoehn, T ;
Grosu, P .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46 (01) :349-357