MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease:: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis

被引:123
作者
Rieber, A
Aschoff, A
Nüssle, K
Wruk, D
Tomczak, R
Reinshagen, M
Adler, G
Brambs, HJ
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Dept Gastroenterol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
关键词
MR imaging; gastrointestinal tract; contrast agent; inflammatory bowel disease; Crohn's disease;
D O I
10.1007/s003300000354
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate the additional findings of MRI following small bowel enteroclysis and to compare the efficacy of negative Lna positive intraluminal contrast agents. Fifty patients with inflammatory or tumorous small bowel disease were investigated by small bower enteroclysis and consecutive MRI using breathhold protocol (T1-weighted fast low-angle shot, T2-weighted turbo spin echo). Patients were randomly assigned to either reg a positive oral (Magnevist, Schering, Berlin, Germany) or a negative oral MR contrast media (Abdoscan, Nycomed, Oslo, Norway). The pattern of contrast distribution, the contrast effect, presence artifacts, as well as bowel wall and extraluminal changes, were determined and compared between the contrast type using Fischer's exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for MRI and enteroclysis were calculated. Twenty-seven patients had clinically proven Crohn's disease and two patients surgically proven small bowel tumours. Magnetic resonance imaging had important additional findings as abscesses and fistulae in 20 patients. Surgically compared sensitivities were 100 and 0% for MRI and enteroclysis, for the detection of abscesses, and 83.3 and 17% for the diagnosis of fistulae, respectively. Bowel wall thickening was more reliably detected with use of positive oral contrast media without intravenous enhancement (p < 0.001), whereas postcontrast negative oral contrast media allow for a superior detection (p < 0.001). T2-weighted sequences were necessary with use of negative oral contrast media, because loop abscesses may be ed. Magnetic resonance imaging should be performed in all patients with suspicion of extraintestinal complications, because the complications are ore reliably detected by MRI. Negative oral contrast media show advantages with the: use of intravenous contrast but can mask loop abscesses using only T1-weighted imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / 1382
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Angelelli G, 1990, Radiol Med, V79, P65
[2]   MR enteroclysis for MR diagnosis of inflammatory small bowel disease with contrast enhancement. [J].
Aschoff, AJ ;
Zeitler, H ;
Merkle, EM ;
Reinshagen, M ;
Brambs, HJ ;
Rieber, A .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1997, 167 (04) :387-391
[3]  
HAHN P F, 1991, AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, V156, P252
[4]   BLUEBERRY JUICE - PRELIMINARY EVALUATION AS AN ORAL CONTRAST AGENT IN GASTROINTESTINAL MR-IMAGING [J].
HIRAISHI, K ;
NARABAYASHI, I ;
FUJITA, O ;
YAMAMOTO, K ;
SAGAMI, A ;
HISADA, Y ;
SAIKA, Y ;
ADACHI, I ;
HASEGAWA, H .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (01) :119-123
[5]   Breathhold MRI of the small bowel in Crohn's disease after enteroclysis with oral magnetic particles [J].
Holzknecht, N ;
Helmberger, T ;
von Ritter, C ;
Gauger, J ;
Faber, S ;
Reiser, M .
RADIOLOGE, 1998, 38 (01) :29-36
[6]   GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE AS A BOWEL CONTRAST AGENT - SAFETY AND EFFICACY [J].
KAMINSKY, S ;
LANIADO, M ;
GOGOLL, M ;
KORNMESSER, W ;
CLAUSS, W ;
LANGER, M ;
CLAUSSEN, C ;
FELIX, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (02) :503-508
[7]   CROHNS-DISEASE - PILOT-STUDY COMPARING MRI OF THE ABDOMEN WITH CLINICAL-EVALUATION [J].
KETTRITZ, U ;
ISAACS, K ;
WARSHAUER, DM ;
SEMELKA, RC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 21 (03) :249-253
[8]   INSIGHTS OF AN ABDOMINAL IMAGER - WHAT DO WE NEED FOR MRI ENHANCEMENT [J].
KRESSEL, HY .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 22 (02) :314-318
[9]   Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT [J].
Low, RN ;
Barone, RM ;
Lacey, C ;
Sigeti, JS ;
Alzate, GD ;
Sebrechts, CP .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (02) :513-520
[10]   MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with IV gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT [J].
Low, RN ;
Francis, IR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1051-1059