Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products

被引:35
作者
Song, XM [1 ]
Montoya-Weiss, MM [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, Dept Mkt & Supply Chain Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1540-5885.1520124
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Does the development of really new products require a different approach front that of incremental new products' Current research and management practice seem to suggest that an), successful new product development (NPD) process comprises a set of key activities, regardless of a product's innovativeness. It seems almost foolhardy to suggest that NPD could proceed without proficiency in all of the following tasks: strategic planning, idea development and screening, business and market opportunity analysis, technical development, product testing, and product commercialization. Suggesting that the difference may be in the details, X. Michael Song and Mitzi Monroya-Weiss present the results of a study that examines the development of 163 really new products and 169 incremental new products. The study's objective is to compare the NPD processes and performance outcomes of really new and incremental products. In other words, the study examines the interplay, between a product's innovativeness, the NPD process, and the product's performance in the marketplace. For the firms in rite study, four sets of NPD activities-strategic planning, market analysis, technical development, and product commercialization-are key determinants of new product success for both really new products and incremental products. However strategic planning and business and market opportunity analysis activities play contrasting roles for the two types of products. Working to improve proficiency in business and market opportunity analysis may be counterproductive for really new products, but if cart increase the profitability of incremental products. Conversely, improving the proficiency, of strategic planning activities has a positive effect on the profitability of the really new products, but it has a negative effect for the incremental products. Overall, the really newt products in the study surpass the incremental products in meeting profit objectives. Comparing current practice to best practice, the firms in the study, have room for improvement. For both really new and incremental products, the firms in the study do not place sufficient emphasis on product commercialization activities. The participants also need to reassess the relative emphasis they place on strategic planning activities. The projects involving really new products do not place sufficient emphasis on strategic planning, while the incremental projects exhibit a relatively high level of proficiency in this area-exactly the opposite of the order that this study recommends.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 135
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J ACAD MARKETING SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], J PROD INNOVAT MANAG
[3]  
ANSOFF HI, 1957, HARVARD BUS REV, V35, P113
[4]  
*BOOZ ALL HAM INC, NEW PROD MAN 1980
[5]   DIMENSIONS OF INDUSTRIAL NEW PRODUCT SUCCESS AND FAILURE [J].
COOPER, RG .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1979, 43 (03) :93-103
[6]   AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE NEW PRODUCT PROCESS - STEPS, DEFICIENCIES, AND IMPACT [J].
COOPER, RG ;
KLEINSCHMIDT, EJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1986, 3 (02) :71-85
[7]   THE HIDDEN COSTS OF ACCELERATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT [J].
CRAWFORD, CM .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1992, 9 (03) :188-199
[8]  
Crawford M., 1991, New Products Management, VThird
[9]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method
[10]   PRINCIPLES VS PRACTICE IN NEW PRODUCT-PLANNING [J].
FELDMAN, LP ;
PAGE, AL .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1984, 1 (01) :43-55