Acute complications associated with Greenfield filter insertion in high-risk trauma patients

被引:31
作者
Duperier, T [1 ]
Mosenthal, A [1 ]
Swan, KG [1 ]
Kaul, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2003年 / 54卷 / 03期
关键词
Greenfield filter; complications; pulmonary embolism; arteriovenous fistula; deep venous thrombosis;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-200303000-00018
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Use of Greenfield filters (GFs) to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in trauma patients is generally well accepted. Nonetheless, a surprisingly small number of trauma surgeons insert filters in their patients. Among the reasons cited is fear of complications. Methods: We observed three femoral arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) in trauma patients who had inferior vena caval placement of filters for PE prophylaxis in one 12-month period (academic year 1999). In an effort to document the magnitude of this problem, we evaluated trauma patients who had a GF inserted in academic year 2000. Results: During that year, 133 consecutive patients (8.6% of trauma admissions) received 133 GFs through a percutaneous approach. The most common isolated indications for GF insertion included closed head injuries (n = 28), multiple long bone fractures (n = 27), pelvic and acetabular fractures (n 6), spinal cord injuries (n = 16), and vertebral fractures (n = 3). Five patients had documented deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by duplex ultrasonography before GF placement, and 11 patients had other indications requiring a filter. There were 37 patients with more than one indication requiring filter placement. Most patients (57%) underwent preinsertion duplex scanning of their lower extremity veins; 77% of patients underwent postinsertion scanning. Filters were inserted an average of 6.8 +/- 0.6 (SE) days after trauma. No AVF were suspected clinically or detected ultrasonographically. No operative or postoperative complications occurred. DVT was observed in 30% of patients despite 92% prophylaxis; there was a 26% incidence of de novo thrombi detected. None of the patients evidenced DVT clinically. Conclusion: Our data indicate that complications of GF insertion for prophylaxis against PE from DVT complicating trauma patients continue to be negligible. In addition, the incidence of insertion-site thrombosis may be lower than expected. Moreover, femoral AVF is a rare complication of this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 549
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
GREENFIELD LJ, 1977, ANN SURG, V185, P692, DOI 10.1097/00000658-197706000-00012
[12]   ACCIDENTAL PLACEMENT OF THE GREENFIELD FILTER IN THE HEART - REPORT OF 2 CASES [J].
HIRSCH, SB ;
HARRINGTON, EB ;
MILLER, CM ;
ESTIOKO, MR ;
HAIMOV, M .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1987, 6 (06) :609-610
[13]   PERCUTANEOUS INSERTION OF THE KIMRAY-GREENFIELD FILTER - INCIDENCE OF FEMORAL VEIN-THROMBOSIS [J].
KANTOR, A ;
GLANZ, S ;
GORDON, DH ;
SCLAFANI, SJA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (05) :1065-1066
[14]  
KAPSCH DN, 1984, SURGERY, V95, P473
[15]   PROPHYLACTIC GREENFIELD FILTER PLACEMENT IN SELECTED HIGH-RISK TRAUMA PATIENTS [J].
KHANSARINIA, S ;
DENNIS, JW ;
VELDENZ, HC ;
BUTCHER, JL ;
HARTLAND, L .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 22 (03) :231-236
[16]  
KNIGHT MTN, 1976, LANCET, V2, P1265
[17]   Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients at high risk: Follow-up examination and risk/benefit assessment [J].
Langan, EM ;
Miller, RS ;
Casey, WJ ;
Carsten, CG ;
Graham, RM ;
Taylor, SM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (03) :484-488
[18]  
LEACH TA, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P292
[19]   PERFORATION OF THE INFERIOR VENA-CAVA BY A RECENTLY INSERTED GREENFIELD FILTER [J].
MASTROBATTISTA, JM ;
CAPUTO, TA ;
BUSH, HS .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 56 (03) :399-401
[20]   Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism [J].
McMurtry, AL ;
Owings, JT ;
Anderson, JT ;
Battistella, FD ;
Gosselin, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (03) :314-320