Incorporating spatial non-stationarity of regression coefficients into predictive vegetation models

被引:111
作者
Kupfer, John A.
Farris, Calvin A.
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Dept Geog, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Geog & Reg Dev, Tree Ring Res Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
geographically weighted regression; ponderosa pine; Rincon Mountains; Arizona;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-006-9058-2
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The results of predictive vegetation models are often presented spatially as GIS-derived surfaces of vegetation attributes across a landscape or region, but spatial information is rarely included in the model itself. Geographically weighted regression (GWR), which extends the traditional regression framework by allowing regression coefficients to vary for individual locations ('spatial non-stationarity'), is one method of utilizing spatial information to improve the predictive power of such models. In this paper, we compare the ability of GWR, a local model, with that of ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression, a global model, to predict patterns of montane ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) basal area in Saguaro National Park, AZ, USA on the basis of variables related to topography (elevation, slope steepness, aspect) and fire history (fire frequency, time since fire). The localized regression coefficients exhibited significant non-stationarity for four of the five environmental variables, and the GWR model consequently described the vegetation-environment data significantly better, even after accounting for differences in model complexity. GWR also reduced observed spatial autocorrelation of the model residuals. When applied to independent data locations not used in model development, basal areas predicted by GWR had a closer fit to observed values with lower residuals than those from the optimal OLS regression model. GWR also provided insights into fine-scale controls of ponderosa pine pattern that were missed by the global model. For example, the relationship between ponderosa pine basal area and aspect, which was obscured in the OLS regression model due to non-stationarity, was clearly demonstrated by the GWR model. We thus see GWR as a valuable complement to the many other global methods currently in use for predictive vegetation modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 852
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]  
Franklin J, 2002, APPL VEG SCI, V5, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2002.tb00543.x
[22]   Bioclimatic modelling using Gaussian mixture distributions and multiscale segmentation [J].
Gavin, DG ;
Hu, FS .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2005, 14 (05) :491-501
[23]   Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology [J].
Guisan, A ;
Zimmermann, NE .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 135 (2-3) :147-186
[24]   Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? [J].
Gustafson, EJ .
ECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 1 (02) :143-156
[25]   Quantifying landscape structure: A review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes [J].
HainesYoung, R ;
Chopping, M .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (04) :418-445
[26]   Relative influences of current and historical factors on mammal and bird diversity patterns in deglaciated North America [J].
Hawkins, BA ;
Porter, EE .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (06) :475-481
[27]   Environmental responses of Pinus ponderosa and associated species in the south-western USA [J].
Humphries, HC ;
Bourgeron, PS .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 30 (02) :257-276
[28]  
Iverson LR, 1998, ECOL MONOGR, V68, P465, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0465:PAOTSF]2.0.CO
[29]  
2
[30]   Spatial modeling of rangeland potential vegetation environments [J].
Jensen, ME ;
Dibenedetto, JP ;
Barber, JA ;
Montagne, C ;
Bourgeron, PS .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 54 (05) :528-536