Position of chromatographic techniques in screening for detection of drugs or poisons in clinical and forensic toxicology and/or doping control

被引:135
作者
Maurer, HH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Inst Expt & Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Dept Expt & Clin Toxicol, D-66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
关键词
chromatography; diode-array detection; drugs; mass spectrometry; screening;
D O I
10.1515/CCLM.2004.250
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This paper reviews chromatographic screening procedures for simultaneous detection of several drug classes relevant to clinical and forensic toxicology or doping control in urine or blood using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography coupled with a diode-array detector (LC-DAD) or a mass spectrometer (LC-MS). The pros and cons of the different techniques and procedures are discussed leading to the following conclusions and perspectives. GC-MS, especially in the electron ionization full-scan mode, is still the method of choice for comprehensive screening providing best separation power, specificity and universality, although requiring derivatization. LC-DAD is also often used for screening, but its separation power and its specificity are still inferior to those of GC-MS. Finally, LC-MS has shown to be an ideal supplement, especially for the detection of more polar, thermolabile and/or low-dose drugs, especially in blood plasma. It may become the gold standard in clinical and forensic toxicology and doping control if, at a later date, the costs of the apparatus will be markedly reduced, the current disadvantages like irreproducibility of fragmentation, reduction of ionization by matrix, etc. will be overcome, and finally if one of the increasing number of quite different techniques will become the apparatus standard.
引用
收藏
页码:1310 / 1324
页数:15
相关论文
共 153 条
[11]   Matrix effect in bio-analysis of illicit drugs with LC-MS/MS: Influence of ionization type, sample preparation, and biofluid [J].
Dams, R ;
Huestis, MA ;
Lambert, WE ;
Murphy, CM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2003, 14 (11) :1290-1294
[12]   Simultaneous determination of in total 17 opium alkaloids and opioids in blood and urine by fast liquid chromatography-diode-array detection-fluorescence detection, after solid-phase extraction [J].
Dams, R ;
Benijts, T ;
Lambert, WE ;
De Leenheer, AP .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2002, 773 (01) :53-61
[13]   Comparison of phenyl-type columns in the development of a fast liquid chromatographic system for eighteen opiates commonly found in forensic toxicology [J].
Dams, R ;
Lambert, WE ;
Clauwaert, KM ;
De Leenheer, AP .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 896 (1-2) :311-319
[14]   Piperazine-like compounds:: a new group of designer drugs-of-abuse on the European market [J].
de Boer, D ;
Bosman, IJ ;
Hidvégi, E ;
Manzoni, C ;
Benkö, AA ;
dos Reys, LJAL ;
Maes, RAA .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 121 (1-2) :47-56
[15]  
Decaestecker TN, 2000, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V14, P1787, DOI 10.1002/1097-0231(20001015)14:19<1787::AID-RCM94>3.0.CO
[16]  
2-S
[17]   Suitability testing of commercial solid-phase extraction sorbents for sample clean-up in systematic toxicological analysis using liquid chromatography-(tandem) mass spectrometry [J].
Decaestecker, TN ;
Coopman, EM ;
Van Peteghem, CH ;
Van Bocxlaer, JF .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2003, 789 (01) :19-25
[18]   Screening for 18 diuretics and probenecid in doping analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Deventer, K ;
Delbeke, FT ;
Roels, K ;
Van Eenoo, P .
BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2002, 16 (08) :529-535
[19]   Postmortem drug analysis: Analytical and toxicological aspects [J].
Drummer, OH ;
Gerostamoulos, J .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2002, 24 (02) :199-209
[20]   Simultaneous determination of benzodiazepines in whole blood or serum by HPLC/DAD with a semi-micro column [J].
El Mahjoub, A ;
Staub, C .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2000, 23 (2-3) :447-458