What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

被引:140
作者
Eade, Thomas N.
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
Horwitz, Eric M.
Buyyounouski, Mark K.
Hanks, Gerald E.
Pollack, Alan
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; radiotherapy; dose;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify the radiotherapy dose-response of prostate cancer, adjusted for prognostic factors in a mature cohort of men treated relatively uniformly at a single institution. Patients and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 1,530 men treated with three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy between 1989 and 2002. Patients were divided into four isocenter dose groups: < 70 Gy (n = 43), 70-74.9 Gy (n = 552), 75-79.9 Gy (n = 568), and 2:80 Gy In = 367). The primary endpoints were freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), defined by American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and Phoenix (nadir + 2.0 ng/mL) criteria, and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Multivariate analyses were performed and adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Logit regression dose-response functions were determined at 5 and 8 years for FFBF and at 5 and 10 years for FFDM. Results: Radiotherapy dose was significant in multivariate analyses for FFBF (ASTRO and Phoenix) and FFDM. Adjusted 5-year estimates of ASTRO FFBF for the four dose groups were 60%, 68%, 76%, and 84%. Adjusted 5-year Phoenix FFBFs for the four dose groups were 70%, 81%, 83%, and 89%. Adjusted 5-year and 10-year estimates of FFDM for the four dose groups were 96% and 93 %, 97 % and 93 %, 99 % and 95 %, and 98 % and 96%. Dose-response functions showed an increasing benefit for doses >= 80 Gy. Conclusions: Doses of >= 80 Gy are recommended for most men with prostate cancer. The ASTRO definition of biochemical failure does not accurately estimate the effects of radiotherapy at 5 years because of backdating, compared to the Phoenix definition, which is less sensitive to follow-up and more reproducible over time. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Epstein, B ;
Horwitz, EM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :427-435
[12]   Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Pinover, WH ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Price, RA ;
Schultheiss, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :823-832
[13]  
Horwitz EM, 2001, CANCER, V92, P1281, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1281::AID-CNCR1449>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-9
[15]  
International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements, 1993, 50 ICRU
[16]   The relationship of increasing radiotherapy dose to reduced distant metastases and mortality in men with prostate cancer [J].
Jacob, R ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Movsas, B ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Pollack, A .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (03) :538-543
[17]   Supraadditive apoptotic response of R3327-G rat prostate tumors to androgen ablation and radiation [J].
Joon, DL ;
Hasegawa, M ;
Sikes, C ;
Khoo, VS ;
Terry, NHA ;
Zagars, GK ;
Meistrich, ML ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (05) :1071-1077
[18]   Failure definition-dependent differences in outcome following radiation for localized prostate cancer: Can one size fit all? [J].
Kuban, D ;
Thames, H ;
Levy, L ;
Horwitz, E ;
Kupelian, P ;
Martinez, A ;
Michalski, J ;
Pisansky, T ;
Sandler, H ;
Shipley, W ;
Zelefsky, M ;
Zietman, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (02) :409-414
[19]   Improved biochemical relapse-free survival with increased external radiation doses in patients with localized prostate cancer: The combined experience of nine institutions in patients treated in 1994 and 1995 [J].
Kupelian, P ;
Kuban, D ;
Thames, H ;
Levy, L ;
Horwitz, E ;
Martinez, A ;
Michalski, J ;
Pisansky, T ;
Sandler, H ;
Shipley, W ;
Zelefsky, M ;
Zietman, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (02) :415-419
[20]   Higher than standard radiation doses (≥72 Gy) with or without androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer [J].
Kupelian, PA ;
Mohan, DS ;
Lyons, J ;
Klein, EA ;
Reddy, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (03) :567-574