PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations

被引:664
作者
Mattes, D
Haynor, DR
Vesselle, H
Lewellen, TK
Eubank, W
机构
[1] Boeing Co, Phantom Works, M&CT, Adv Syst Lab, Seattle, WA 98124 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Imaging Res Lab, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
computed tomography (CT); deformation; multimodality; multiresolution; mutual information; nonlinear; nonrigid; positron emission tomography (PET); registration; validation;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2003.809072
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We have implemented and validated an algorithm for three-dimensional positron emission tomography transmission-to-computed tomography registration in the chest, using mutual information as a similarity criterion. Inherent differences in the two imaging protocols produce significant nonrigid motion between the two acquisitions. A rigid body deformation combined with localized cubic B-splines is used to capture this motion. The deformation is defined on a regular grid and is parameterized by potentially several thousand coefficients. Together with a spline-based continuous representation of images and Parzen histogram estimates, our deformation model allows closed-form expressions for the criterion and its gradient. A limited-memory quasi-Newton optimization algorithm is used in a hierarchical multiresolution framework to automatically align the images. To characterize the performance of the method, 27 scans from patients involved in routine lung cancer staging were used in a validation study. The registrations were assessed visually by two expert observers in specific anatomic locations using a split window validation technique. The visually reported errors are in the 0- to 6-mm range and the average computation time is 100 min on a moderate-performance workstation.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MATRIX COMPUTATION
[2]  
Bendriem B., 1998, THEORY PRACTICE 3D P, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-3475-2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-3475-2]
[3]   A SURVEY OF IMAGE REGISTRATION TECHNIQUES [J].
BROWN, LG .
COMPUTING SURVEYS, 1992, 24 (04) :325-376
[4]   Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain [J].
Fitzpatrick, JM ;
Hill, DLG ;
Shyr, Y ;
West, J ;
Studholme, C ;
Maurer, CR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (04) :571-585
[5]   Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration [J].
Holden, M ;
Hill, DLG ;
Denton, ERE ;
Jarosz, JM ;
Cox, TCS ;
Rohlfing, T ;
Goodey, J ;
Hawkes, DJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (02) :94-102
[6]   Multiresolution elastic image registration [J].
Kostelec, PJ ;
Weaver, JB ;
Healy, DM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (09) :1593-1604
[7]   Unwarping of unidirectionally distorted EPI images [J].
Kybic, J ;
Thévenaz, P ;
Nirkko, A ;
Unser, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (02) :80-93
[8]   A survey of hierarchical non-linear medical image registration [J].
Lester, H ;
Arridge, SR .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, 32 (01) :129-149
[9]   Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information [J].
Maes, F ;
Collignon, A ;
Vandermeulen, D ;
Marchal, G ;
Suetens, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (02) :187-198
[10]  
NOCEDAL J, 2000, NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATI, pCH8