Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG)

被引:342
作者
Mendling, J. [1 ]
Reijers, H. A. [2 ]
van der Aalst, W. M. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Business process modeling; Model quality; Guidelines; CONTROL-FLOW; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; ERRORS; EPCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.infsof.2009.08.004
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Business process modeling is heavily applied in practice, but important quality issues have not been addressed thoroughly by research. A notorious problem is the low level of modeling competence that many casual modelers in process documentation projects have. Existing approaches towards model quality might be of benefit, but they suffer from at least one of the following problems. On the one hand, frameworks like SEQUAL and the Guidelines of Modeling are too abstract to be applicable for novices and non-experts in practice. On the other hand, there are collections of pragmatic hints that lack a sound research foundation. In this paper, we analyze existing research on relationships between model structure on the one hand and error probability and understanding on the other hand. As a synthesis we propose a set of seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Each of these guidelines builds on strong empirical insights, yet they are formulated to be intuitive to practitioners. Furthermore, we analyze how the guidelines are prioritized by industry experts. In this regard, the seven guidelines have the potential to serve as an important tool of knowledge transfer from academia into modeling practice. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Object-oriented modeling with UML: A study of developers' perceptions [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Sinha, AP .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2003, 46 (09) :248-256
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACM COMPUT SURV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, 9126 ISOIEC
[4]   Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study [J].
Bandara, W ;
Gable, GG ;
Rosemann, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 14 (04) :347-360
[5]  
Becker J, 2000, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1806, P30
[6]   A family of experiments to validate metrics for software process models [J].
Canfora, G ;
García, F ;
Piattini, M ;
Ruiz, F ;
Visaggio, CA .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2005, 77 (02) :113-129
[7]   Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation [J].
Cardoso, Jorge .
2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICES COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, :167-173
[8]   PROCESS MODELING [J].
CURTIS, B ;
KELLNER, MI ;
OVER, J .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1992, 35 (09) :75-90
[9]  
DANDEKAR A, 1997, SOFTWARE PROCESS IMP, V3, P87
[10]   How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? [J].
Davies, Islay ;
Green, Peter ;
Rosemann, Michael ;
Indulska, Marta ;
Gallo, Stan .
DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 58 (03) :358-380