Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice?

被引:406
作者
Carlberg, B
Samuelsson, O
Lindholm, LJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, SE-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17355-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Atenolol is one of the most widely used beta blockers clinically, and has often been used as a reference drug in randomised controlled trials of hypertension. However, questions have been raised about atenolol as the best reference drug for comparisons with other antihypertensives. Thus, our aim was to systematically review the effect of atenolol on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients. Methods Reports were identified through searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, relevant textbooks, and by persona communication with established researchers in hypertension. Randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of atenolol on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with primary hypertension were included. Findings We identified four studies that compared atenolol with placebo or no treatment, and five that compared atenolol with other anti hypertensive drugs. Despite major differences in blood pressure lowering, there were no outcome differences between atenolol and placebo in the four studies, comprising 6825 patients, who were followed up for a mean of 4.6 years on all-cause mortality (relative risk 1.01 [95% Cl 0.89-1.15]), cardiovascular mortality (0.99 [0.83-1.18]), or myocardial infarction (0.99 [0.83-1.19]). The risk of stroke, however, tended to be lower in the atenolol than in the placebo group (0.85 [0.72-1.01]). When atenolol was compared with other antihypertensives, there were no major differences in blood pressure lowering between the treatment arms. Our meta-analysis showed a significantly higher mortality (1.13 [1.02-1.25]) with atenolol treatment than with other active treatment, in the five studies comprising 17 671 patients who were followed up for a mean of 4.6 years. Moreover, cardiovascular mortality also tended to be higher with atenolol treatment than with other antihypertensive treatment. Stroke was also more frequent with atenolol treatment. Interpretation Our results cast doubts on atenolol as a suitable drug for hypertensive patients. Moreover, they challenge the use of atenolol as a reference drug in outcome trials in hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:1684 / 1689
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials
    Law, MR
    Wald, NJ
    Morris, JK
    Jordan, RE
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7404): : 1427 - 1431
  • [22] Lechat P, 1999, LANCET, V353, P9
  • [23] 2003 European society of hypertension -: European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
    Mancia, G
    Rosei, EA
    Cifkova, R
    DeBacker, G
    Erdine, S
    Fagard, R
    Farsang, C
    Heagerty, AM
    Kawecka-Jaszcs, K
    Kiowski, W
    Kjeldsen, S
    Lüscher, T
    McInnes, G
    Mallion, JM
    Brien, EO
    Poulter, NR
    Priori, SG
    Rahn, KH
    Rodicio, JL
    Ruilope, LM
    Safar, M
    Staessen, JA
    van Zwieten, P
    Waeber, B
    Williams, B
    Zanchetti, A
    Zannad, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 (06) : 1011 - 1053
  • [24] MEADE TW, 1992, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V304, P405
  • [25] β-blockers in hypertension -: The emperor has no clothes:: An open letter to present and prospective drafters of new guidelines for the treatment of hypertension
    Messerli, FH
    Beevers, DG
    Franklin, SS
    Pickering, TG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 16 (10) : 870 - 873
  • [26] CENTRAL BETA-ADRENERGIC MECHANISMS MAY MODULATE ISCHEMIC VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION IN PIGS
    PARKER, GW
    MICHAEL, LH
    HARTLEY, CJ
    SKINNER, JE
    ENTMAN, ML
    [J]. CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1990, 66 (02) : 259 - 270
  • [27] A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease - The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A randomized controlled trial
    Pepine, CJ
    Handberg, EM
    Cooper-Dehoff, RM
    Marks, RG
    Kowey, P
    Messerli, FH
    Mancia, G
    Cangiano, JL
    Garcia-Barreto, D
    Keltai, M
    Erdine, S
    Bristol, HA
    Kolb, HR
    Bakris, GL
    Cohen, JD
    Parmley, WW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (21): : 2805 - 2816
  • [28] PROGRESSIVE IMPROVEMENT IN THE STRUCTURE OF RESISTANCE ARTERIES OF HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS AFTER 2 YEARS OF TREATMENT WITH AN ANGIOTENSIN-I-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITOR - COMPARISON WITH EFFECTS OF A BETA-BLOCKER
    SCHIFFRIN, EL
    DENG, LY
    LAROCHELLE, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1995, 8 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [29] Schiffrin EL, 2000, CIRCULATION, V101, P1653
  • [30] Effect of crossing over hypertensive patients from a beta-blocker to an angiotensin receptor antagonist on resistance artery structure and on endothelial function
    Schiffrin, EL
    Park, JB
    Pu, Q
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 (01) : 71 - 78