Influence, of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models

被引:26
作者
Van Uitert, R
Johnson, C
Zhukov, L
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sci Comp & Imaging Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Comp Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
finite element method; MEG; source localization; tissue conductivity;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2004.836490
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The influence of head tissue conductivity on magnetoencephalography (MEG) was investigated by comparing the normal component of the magnetic field calculated at 61 detectors and the localization accuracy of realistic head finite element method (FEM) models using dipolar sources and containing altered scalp, skull, cerebrospinal fluid, gray, and white matter conductivities to the results obtained using a FEM realistic head model with the same dipolar sources but containing published baseline conductivity values. In the models containing altered conductivity values, the tissue conductivity values were varied, one at a time, between 10% and 200% of their baseline values, and then varied simultaneously. Although changes in conductivity values for a single tissue layer often altered the calculated magnetic field and source localization accuracy only slightly, varying multiple conductivity layers simultaneously caused significant discrepancies in calculated results. The conductivity of scalp, and to a lesser extent that of white and gray matter, appears especially influential in determining the magnetic field. Comparing the results obtained from models containing the baseline conductivity values to the results obtained using other published conductivity values suggests that inaccuracies can occur depending upon Which tissue conductivity values are employed. We show the importance of accurate head tissue conductivities for MEG source localization in human brain, especially for deep dipole sources or when an accuracy greater than 1.4 cm is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2129 / 2137
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to conductivity perturbations [J].
Acar, CE ;
Gençer, NG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: A NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMAN HEALTH, 2003, 25 :2834-2837
[2]  
Burnett DS., 1987, FINITE ELEM ANAL DES
[3]   DEMONSTRATION OF USEFUL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAM AND ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM [J].
COHEN, D ;
CUFFIN, BN .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 56 (01) :38-51
[4]  
FOSTER KR, 1989, CRIT REV BIOMED ENG, V17, P25
[5]   In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data [J].
Gonçalves, S ;
de Munck, JC ;
Verbunt, JPA ;
Heethaar, RM ;
da Silva, FHL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 50 (09) :1124-1128
[6]  
GULRANJANI RM, 1998, BIOELECTRICITY BIOMA
[7]   MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY - THEORY, INSTRUMENTATION, AND APPLICATIONS TO NONINVASIVE STUDIES OF THE WORKING HUMAN BRAIN [J].
HAMALAINEN, M ;
HARI, R ;
ILMONIEMI, RJ ;
KNUUTILA, J ;
LOUNASMAA, OV .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1993, 65 (02) :413-497
[8]   Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head [J].
Haueisen, J ;
Ramon, C ;
Eiselt, M ;
Brauer, H ;
Nowak, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 44 (08) :727-735
[9]  
HUISKAMP G, 1997, P 1 INT S NON FUNCT, P84
[10]  
JIN J, 1993, FINIE ELEMENT METHOD