Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects

被引:35
作者
Harvey, G
Wensing, M
机构
[1] Radcliffe Infirm, Royal Coll Nursing Inst, Oxford OX2 6HE, England
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2003年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qhc.12.3.210
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluation is an integral component of quality improvement and there is much to be learned from the evaluation of small scale quality improvement initiatives at a local level. This type of evaluation is useful for a number of different reasons including monitoring the impact of local projects, identifying and dealing with issues as they arise within a project, comparing local projects to draw lessons, and collecting more detailed information as part of a bigger evaluation project. Focused audits and developmental studies can be used for evaluation within projects, while methods such as multiple case studies and process evaluations can be used to draw generalised lessons from local experiences and to provide examples of successful projects. Evaluations of small scale quality improvement projects help those involved in improvement initiatives to optimise their choice of interventions and use of resources. Important information to add to the knowledge base of quality improvement in health care can be derived by undertaking formal evaluation of local projects, particularly in relation to building theory around the processes of implementation and increasing understanding of the complex change processes involved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Evaluating health interventions
[2]  
ARGYRIS C, 1992, ORGANISATIONAL LEARN
[3]  
Black N, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1215
[4]   Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice. A study using continuous quality improvement methodology [J].
Cox, S ;
Wilcock, P ;
Young, J .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (02) :119-125
[5]   Changing clinical practice: views about the management of adult asthma [J].
Dawson, S ;
Sutherland, K ;
Dopson, S ;
Miller, R .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (04) :253-261
[6]   No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based [J].
Dopson, S ;
FitzGerald, L ;
Ferlie, E ;
Gabbay, J ;
Locock, L .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (03) :35-47
[7]   Influences on clinical practice: the case of glue ear [J].
Dopson, S ;
Miller, R ;
Dawson, S ;
Sutherland, K .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (02) :108-118
[8]   Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies [J].
Eccles, M ;
Grimshaw, J ;
Campbell, M ;
Ramsay, C .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (01) :47-52
[9]   Some limits to evidence-based medicine: a case study from elective orthopaedics [J].
Ferlie, E ;
Wood, M ;
Fitzgerald, L .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (02) :99-107
[10]   Case studies as a research tool [J].
Fitzgerald, L .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (02) :75-75