Efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines

被引:31
作者
Berlutti, F
Testarelli, L
Vaia, F
De Luca, M
Dolci, G
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Sci Sanita Pubbl, Sez Microbiol, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Ist Clin Odontoiatr, I-00166 Rome, Italy
关键词
anti-retraction valves; bacterial contamination; dental unit water lines;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00004-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. In this study we examine the efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing microbial contamination of dental unit water lines (DUWLs). Methods. The study was performed on 54 randomly selected DUs in use at private and public institutions for over six months. The selected DUs were all currently commercially available. To evaluate the efficiency of anti-retraction devices, two different methods were employed, mechanical and microbiological. The ADA/ANSI specification #47 (corresponding to a water retraction of less than 40.3 mul) was used for the evaluation of the retraction determined using the mechanical method; the presence/absence of test microorganisms in DUWLs upstream the turbine after the test was used for evaluating the microbiological assay. Results. Both evaluation methods indicated correct amounts of retraction and prevention of DUWL contamination occurred in only two cases (3.7%). Correct retraction was noted in six other dental units (DUs), but their DUWLs became contaminated during testing. Six other produced the opposite results-improper retraction, yet no contamination. The remaining 40 DUs (74.0%) failed both evaluations. Conclusion. The results showed that the overwhelming majority of the anti-retraction devices did not prevent retraction when the turbine stopped running, leading to a contamination of the water lines, and to a consequent possible cross-contamination of the patients. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Artini M, 2002, J DENT RES, V81, pA111
[2]  
Cobb Charles M, 2002, J Dent Educ, V66, P549
[3]  
DAVIS DM, 1991, J CHEM SOC P2, P15491
[4]   BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION OF DENTAL HANDPIECES [J].
KELLETT, M ;
HOLBROOK, WP .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1980, 8 (03) :249-253
[5]  
Kumar, 2001, J NEW JERSEY DENT AS, V72, P38
[6]  
Lee T K, 2001, J Calif Dent Assoc, V29, P679
[7]   CROSS-CONTAMINATION POTENTIAL WITH DENTAL EQUIPMENT [J].
LEWIS, DL ;
ARENS, M ;
APPLETON, SS ;
NAKASHIMA, K ;
RYU, J ;
BOE, RK ;
PATRICK, JB ;
WATANABE, DT ;
SUZUKI, M .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8830) :1252-1254
[8]  
LOGAN NA, 1999, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO
[9]   Dental unit waterlines: Biofilms, disinfection and recurrence [J].
Meiller, TF ;
DePaola, LG ;
Kelley, JI ;
Baqui, AAMA ;
Turng, BF ;
Falkler, WA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 130 (01) :65-72
[10]  
Montebugnoli L, 2002, J DENT RES, V81, pA111