Regional Scale Prioritisation for Key Ecosystem Services, Renewable Energy Production and Urban Development

被引:19
作者
Casalegno, Stefano [1 ]
Bennie, Jonathan J. [1 ]
Inger, Richard [1 ]
Gaston, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn, Cornwall, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; SATELLITE; SUPPORT; CARBON; REFLECTANCE; LANDSCAPES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0107822
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although the importance of addressing ecosystem service benefits in regional land use planning and decision-making is evident, substantial practical challenges remain. In particular, methods to identify priority areas for the provision of key ecosystem services and other environmental services (benefits from the environment not directly linked to the function of ecosystems) need to be developed. Priority areas are locations which provide disproportionally high benefits from one or more service. Here we map a set of ecosystem and environmental services and delineate priority areas according to different scenarios. Each scenario is produced by a set of weightings allocated to different services and corresponds to different landscape management strategies which decision makers could undertake. Using the county of Cornwall, U. K., as a case study, we processed gridded maps of key ecosystem services and environmental services, including renewable energy production and urban development. We explored their spatial distribution patterns and their spatial covariance and spatial stationarity within the region. Finally we applied a complementarity-based priority ranking algorithm (zonation) using different weighting schemes. Our conclusions are that (i) there are two main patterns of service distribution in this region, clustered services (including agriculture, carbon stocks, urban development and plant production) and dispersed services (including cultural services, energy production and floods mitigation); (ii) more than half of the services are spatially correlated and there is high non-stationarity in the spatial covariance between services; and (iii) it is important to consider both ecosystem services and other environmental services in identifying priority areas. Different weighting schemes provoke drastic changes in the delineation of priority areas and therefore decision making processes need to carefully consider the relative values attributed to different services.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities
    Anderson, Barbara J.
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Eigenbrod, Felix
    Thomas, Chris D.
    Gillings, Simon
    Heinemeyer, Andreas
    Roy, David B.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) : 888 - 896
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, FARM MAN HDB
  • [5] [Anonymous], MON ENG NAT ENV SURV
  • [6] ESTIMATING ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AND LEAF-AREA INDEX FROM SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE IN WHEAT
    ASRAR, G
    FUCHS, M
    KANEMASU, ET
    HATFIELD, JL
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) : 300 - 306
  • [7] ASTER, 2012, ADV SPAC THERM EM RE
  • [8] Bagstad K, 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [9] Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Harwood, Amii R.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Watson, Robert T.
    Abson, David J.
    Andrews, Barnaby
    Binner, Amy
    Crowe, Andrew
    Day, Brett H.
    Dugdale, Steve
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Foden, Jo
    Hadley, David
    Haines-Young, Roy
    Hulme, Mark
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    Lovett, Andrew A.
    Munday, Paul
    Pascual, Unai
    Paterson, James
    Perino, Grischa
    Sen, Antara
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    van Soest, Daan
    Termansen, Mette
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) : 45 - 50
  • [10] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300