Regional Scale Prioritisation for Key Ecosystem Services, Renewable Energy Production and Urban Development

被引:19
作者
Casalegno, Stefano [1 ]
Bennie, Jonathan J. [1 ]
Inger, Richard [1 ]
Gaston, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn, Cornwall, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; SATELLITE; SUPPORT; CARBON; REFLECTANCE; LANDSCAPES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0107822
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although the importance of addressing ecosystem service benefits in regional land use planning and decision-making is evident, substantial practical challenges remain. In particular, methods to identify priority areas for the provision of key ecosystem services and other environmental services (benefits from the environment not directly linked to the function of ecosystems) need to be developed. Priority areas are locations which provide disproportionally high benefits from one or more service. Here we map a set of ecosystem and environmental services and delineate priority areas according to different scenarios. Each scenario is produced by a set of weightings allocated to different services and corresponds to different landscape management strategies which decision makers could undertake. Using the county of Cornwall, U. K., as a case study, we processed gridded maps of key ecosystem services and environmental services, including renewable energy production and urban development. We explored their spatial distribution patterns and their spatial covariance and spatial stationarity within the region. Finally we applied a complementarity-based priority ranking algorithm (zonation) using different weighting schemes. Our conclusions are that (i) there are two main patterns of service distribution in this region, clustered services (including agriculture, carbon stocks, urban development and plant production) and dispersed services (including cultural services, energy production and floods mitigation); (ii) more than half of the services are spatially correlated and there is high non-stationarity in the spatial covariance between services; and (iii) it is important to consider both ecosystem services and other environmental services in identifying priority areas. Different weighting schemes provoke drastic changes in the delineation of priority areas and therefore decision making processes need to carefully consider the relative values attributed to different services.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [51] Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England
    Luisetti, Tiziana
    Turner, R. Kerry
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Morse-Jones, Sian
    Adams, Christopher
    Fonseca, Leila
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (03) : 212 - 224
  • [52] Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union
    Maes, Joachim
    Egoh, Benis
    Willemen, Louise
    Liquete, Camino
    Vihervaara, Petteri
    Schaegner, Jan Philipp
    Grizzetti, Bruna
    Drakou, Evangelia G.
    La Notte, Alessandra
    Zulian, Grazia
    Bouraoui, Faycal
    Paracchini, Maria Luisa
    Braat, Leon
    Bidoglio, Giovanni
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [53] Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Southeast Pampas of Argentina
    Maria Paula, Barral
    Nestor Oscar, Maceira
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 154 : 34 - 43
  • [54] Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: lessons from international experiences of spatial planning
    McKenzie, Emily
    Posner, Stephen
    Tillmann, Patricia
    Bernhardt, Joanna R.
    Howard, Kirsten
    Rosenthal, Amy
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (02): : 320 - 340
  • [55] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, 281 WORLD RES I MILL, DOI [10.1196/annals.1439.003, DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003]
  • [56] Carbon in the vegetation and soils of Great Britain
    Milne, R
    Brown, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 49 (04) : 413 - 433
  • [57] MODIS, 2013, MOD RES IM SPECTR MO
  • [58] Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems
    Moilanen, A
    Franco, AMA
    Early, RI
    Fox, R
    Wintle, B
    Thomas, CD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 272 (1575) : 1885 - 1891
  • [59] Moilanen A, 2008, ZONATION SOFTWARE SP
  • [60] Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization
    Moilanen, Atte
    Anderson, Barbara J.
    Eigenbrod, Felix
    Heinemeyer, Andreas
    Roy, David B.
    Gillings, Simon
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Thomas, Chris D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (05) : 1419 - 1426