Comparison of integrated samplers for mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta Supersites project

被引:44
作者
Solomon, P
Baumann, K
Edgerton, E
Tanner, R
Eatough, D
Modey, W
Marin, H
Savoie, D
Natarajan, S
Meyer, MB
Norris, G
机构
[1] US EPA, Las Vegas, NV 89119 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Atmospher Res & Anal Inc, Cary, NC 27513 USA
[4] Tennessee Valley Author, Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 USA
[5] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Chem, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[6] Univ Miami, Rosenstiel Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Div Marine & Atmospher Chem, Miami, FL 33149 USA
[7] Res Triangle Inst, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[8] Rupprecht & Patashnick Co Inc, Albany, NY 12203 USA
[9] US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
chemical speciation; Atlanta Supersites project; filter sampling; comparison study; integrated samplers; PM2.5;
D O I
10.1029/2001JD001218
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] The first of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Particulate Matter (PM) Supersites projects was established in Atlanta, GA, during the summer of 1999 in conjunction with the Southern Oxidants Study. The short-term primary focus was a one month intensive field campaign to evaluate advanced PM measurement methods for measuring PM mass and the chemical and physical properties of PM. Long-term objectives are being met through coordination and cooperation with existing programs in Atlanta and the southeastern United States. Three categories of PM instruments were deployed during August 1999: time-integrated or discrete filter-based methods like those used in EPA's PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Network; continuous or semicontinuous species specific methods, most of which are still in development; and single particle mass spectrometers, the most advanced methods looking at the chemical composition of single particles. The focus of this paper is on comparison of the discrete filter-based methods. Samples were collected by 12 discrete filter-based samplers on an every other day basis during the study period at the Jefferson Street Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) study site. Samples were analyzed for PM2.5 mass, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, organic carbon, elemental carbon, and trace elements, the latter by XRF. Samplers used a variety of filters; denuder-filter combinations in the case of nitrate and organic carbon, particle size fractionating devices, and flow rates. Ambient concentrations for most species were sufficiently above detection limits for testing comparability among samplers, with nitrate being the most notable exception for the major components having an average reported value of 0.5 mug/m(3). Several trace species, e. g., As and Pb, also were often below limits of detection of the analysis method. Results indicate that real differences exist among the samplers tested for most species, with sulfate and ammonium being the exceptions, under the conditions tested. Differences are due to sampler design, and in the case of elemental carbon, also due to the use of different chemical analysis methods. Comparability among most of the samplers for a given species was: mass (+/-20%); sulfate (+/-10%); nitrate (+/-30-35%); ammonium (+/-10-15%); organic carbon either with or without denuders (+/-20%) or including samplers both with and without denuders (+/-35-45%); elemental carbon (+/-20 to +/-200%, the latter if different analysis methods are used); and minor and trace elements (+/-20-30%). A net organic carbon-sampling artifact on quartz-fiber filters was estimated from the comparison of denuded versus undenuded samples and is in the range of 1-4 mug/m(3).
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 61 条
[11]   Descriptive analysis of PM(2.5) and PM(10) at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lu, ZQ ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Frazier, CA ;
Solomon, PA ;
Thuillier, RH ;
Magliano, K .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (12) :2079-2112
[12]   MEASUREMENT METHODS TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH AMBIENT AIR-QUALITY STANDARDS FOR SUSPENDED PARTICLES [J].
CHOW, JC .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1995, 45 (05) :320-382
[13]  
CHOW JC, 1999, GUIDELINE SPECIATED
[14]   Particle size and chemical composition of urban aerosols [J].
Clarke, AG ;
Azadi-Boogar, GA ;
Andrews, GE .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 235 (1-3) :15-24
[15]   Development and evaluation of an impactor for a PM2.5 speciation sampler [J].
Demokritou, P ;
Kavouras, IG ;
Harrison, D ;
Koutrakis, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2001, 51 (04) :514-523
[16]   High-volume diffusion denuder sampler for the routine monitoring of fine particulate matter: I. Design and optimization of the PC-BOSS [J].
Ding, YM ;
Pang, YB ;
Eatough, DJ .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (04) :369-382
[17]   A MULTIPLE-SYSTEM, MULTICHANNEL DIFFUSION DENUDER SAMPLER FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FINE-PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATERIAL IN THE ATMOSPHERE [J].
EATOUGH, DJ ;
WADSWORTH, A ;
EATOUGH, DA ;
CRAWFORD, JW ;
HANSEN, LD ;
LEWIS, EA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1993, 27 (08) :1213-1219
[18]   Integrated and real-time diffusion denuder sampler for PM2.5 [J].
Eatough, DJ ;
Obeidi, F ;
Pang, YB ;
Ding, YM ;
Eatough, NL ;
Wilson, WE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (17) :2835-2844
[19]  
ELDRED RA, 1998, P A WMA INT SPEC C P
[20]   APPLICATION OF THERMAL-ANALYSIS TO THE CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANIC AEROSOL-PARTICLES [J].
ELLIS, EC ;
NOVAKOV, T .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 23 (APR) :227-238