Single-trial EEG Power and Phase Dynamics Associated with Voluntary Response Inhibition

被引:75
作者
Yamanaka, Kentaro [1 ]
Yamamoto, Yoshiharu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; GO-NOGO TASKS; GO/NOGO TASK; STIMULUS PROBABILITY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MRI; WORKING-MEMORY; BRAIN DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2009.21258
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Human voluntary response inhibition has frequently been investigated using go/no-go RT tasks. Recent studies have indicated that not only the traditional averaging waveforms of EEG activities (ERPs) but also the power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG are important in studying the neural correlates of various human cognitive functions. Therefore, here, we aimed to undertake a detailed study of the time/frequency power and phase dynamics of single-trial EEG during go/no-go RT tasks, with focus particularly on the no-go-specific power and phase dynamics, which are presumed to involve the voluntary response inhibition processes. Thus, we demonstrated no-go-specific theta band EEG power increases and intertrial phase-locking in the midline-frontal areas, which are related to no-go-specific midline-frontal negative-positive ERP waveforms (no-go N2/no-go P3). In addition, we observed no-go-specific alpha band EEG intertrial phase-locking with an adjacent dephasing phenomenon, which is mainly associated with the early part of no-go N2. The estimated time point when the no-go-specific midline-frontal dephasing phenomenon occurred corresponded to the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold). Moreover, the no-go-specific phase dynamics in the midline-frontal areas just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency, unlike the power modulations, were affected by changes in the no-go stimulus probability, suggesting the dependence of only phase dynamics on no-go stimulus probability. From these results, we conclude that the complex power and phase dynamics of the theta and alpha band EEG in the midline-frontal areas are specific to no-go trials, being the underlying bases of the no-go-specific ERP waveforms, and suggest that the phase dynamics just before and around the no-go N2 peak latency may involve, at least, the initial part of the voluntary response inhibition process (decision to withhold).
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 727
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   Functional magnetic resonance imaging of single motor events reveals human presupplementary motor area [J].
Humberstone, M ;
Sawle, GV ;
Clare, S ;
Hykin, J ;
Coxon, R ;
Bowtell, R ;
Macdonald, IA ;
Morris, PG .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 42 (04) :632-637
[22]   Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain [J].
Hummel, F ;
Andres, F ;
Altenmüller, E ;
Dichgans, J ;
Gerloff, C .
BRAIN, 2002, 125 :404-420
[23]   Phase-locked alpha and theta oscillations generate the P1-N1 complex and are related to memory performance [J].
Klimesch, W ;
Schack, B ;
Schabus, M ;
Doppelmayr, M ;
Gruber, W ;
Sauseng, P .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (03) :302-316
[24]   EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition-timing hypothesis [J].
Klimesch, Wolfgang ;
Sauseng, Paul ;
Hanslmayr, Simon .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2007, 53 (01) :63-88
[25]   Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI [J].
Konishi, S ;
Nakajima, K ;
Uchida, I ;
Kikyo, H ;
Kameyama, M ;
Miyashita, Y .
BRAIN, 1999, 122 :981-991
[26]   When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography [J].
Lavric, A ;
Pizzagalli, DA ;
Forstmeier, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 20 (09) :2483-2488
[27]   Event-related coherence and event-related desynchronization/synchronization in the 10 Hz and 20 Hz EEG during self-paced movements [J].
Leocani, L ;
Toro, C ;
Manganotti, P ;
Zhuang, P ;
Hallett, M .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 104 (03) :199-206
[28]   Event-related desynchronization in reaction time paradigms: a comparison with event-related potentials and corticospinal excitability [J].
Leocani, L ;
Toro, C ;
Zhuang, P ;
Gerloff, C ;
Hallett, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (05) :923-930
[29]  
Liddle PF, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V12, P100, DOI 10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<100::AID-HBM1007>3.0.CO
[30]  
2-6