The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour

被引:187
作者
Losey, JE [1 ]
Denno, RF [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Entomol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Acyrthosiphon pisum; coccinellid predators; dropping behaviour; heteropteran predators; predator-prey interactions; prey escape response;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00102.x
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
1. The effects of predator species, aphid density, aphid age, diel period, and habitat complexity on the dropping behaviour of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum were assessed in a series of laboratory and field-cage experiments. 2. The presence of foliar-foraging predators significantly increased the proportion of aphids that dropped from alfalfa plants. In the absence of predators, less than 7% of the aphids dropped. Dropping more than doubled (14%) when one of three hemipteran predators, N. americoferus, G. punctipes or O. insidiosus, was present. Nearly 60% of the aphids dropped when the ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata, was present. 3. Adult aphids showed a significantly higher propensity to drop than immature aphids, regardless of the presence or absence of predators. Aphid density had no effect on dropping behaviour. 4. Neither diel period nor habitat complexity had an effect on aphid dropping behaviour. Aphids were significantly more likely to drop in the presence of predators during either the day or night and from either early or late regrowth alfalfa. 5. A review of the factors affecting dropping behaviour, including those elucidated in this study, indicates that the propensity to drop from a plant is influenced by three factors: the risk of predation on the plant, the quality of the resource to be abandoned, and the risk of mortality in the new microhabitat.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 61
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[51]  
*SAS I INC, 1990, SAS STAT GUID PERS C
[52]   BALANCING RISKS - RESPONSES AND NON-RESPONSES OF MAYFLY LARVAE TO FISH AND STONEFLY PREDATORS [J].
SOLUK, DA ;
COLLINS, NC .
OECOLOGIA, 1988, 77 (03) :370-374
[53]   DEFENSE REACTIONS IN APHIDS - THE INFLUENCE OF STATE AND FUTURE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS [J].
STADLER, B ;
WEISSER, WW ;
HOUSTON, AI .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) :419-430
[54]   DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF PREDATORY WASPS (POLISTES-SP, VESPIDAE) ON GREGARIOUS CATERPILLARS (HEMILEUCA-LUCINA, SATURNIIDAE) [J].
STAMP, NE ;
BOWERS, MD .
OECOLOGIA, 1988, 75 (04) :619-624
[55]   DISPERSAL AND REDUCTION OF COLONIES OF PEA APHIDS HEMIPTERA-APHIDIDAE BY APHIDIUS-SMITHI (HYMENOPTERA - APHIDIIDAE) [J].
TAMAKI, G ;
HALFHILL, JE ;
HATHAWAY, DO .
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1970, 63 (04) :973-&
[56]  
THIELE H. U., 1977, CARABID BEETLES THEI
[57]   PREDATION OF THE CEREAL APHID SITOBION-AVENAE BY POLYPHAGOUS PREDATORS ON THE GROUND [J].
WINDER, L .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1990, 15 (01) :105-110
[58]  
WINK M, 1991, ENTOMOL GEN, V15, P237
[59]   ANTIPREDATOR MECHANISMS IN ARTHROPODS - A 20 YEAR LITERATURE SURVEY [J].
WITZ, BW .
FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 1990, 73 (01) :71-99
[60]   THE ECONOMICS OF FLEEING FROM PREDATORS [J].
YDENBERG, RC ;
DILL, LM .
ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, 1986, 16 :229-249