Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis

被引:54
作者
Chang, PL
Shih, HY
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Business & Management, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taichung 407, Taiwan
关键词
intersectoral innovation diffusion; innovation system; network; Taiwan; China;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00077-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents a quantitative method for comparing the structure and performance of intersectoral innovation diffusion in the Taiwanese and Chinese innovation systems. The network of intersectoral innovation diffusion is constructed and proxied by the product-embodied R&D flow matrices calculated by the use of data on input-output tables and sectoral R&D expenditure. The two networks are structurally compared with the help of methodologies derived from the network analysis, which are conducted at the national, cluster and individual levels to thoroughly examine the multi-embededness of the sectors situated in a technological diffusion network. This study shows that the two systems have similar distributions of key sectors, including the cores, i.e. machinery and equipment, electronic parts and components, and the sources, i.e. chemicals and basic metals, of innovation flows. However, significant differences also exist. For example. the Taiwanese system is characterized by higher degrees of systemic connection and hierarchy, while the Chinese system has looser density and less centralization. Additionally, the Taiwanese system appears capable of more efficient innovation diffusion among vertically related industries than the Chinese system due to the former containing more effective clusters. Finally, China's technological concentration is centered on heavy industry, while Taiwan is focused on high-tech industry. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 169
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]  
Leoncini R., 2000, International Review of Applied Economics, V14, P213, DOI DOI 10.1080/02692170050024750
[22]  
LEONCINI R, 2001, DRUID 2001 NELS WINT
[23]  
Lundvall B.A, 1992, National systems of innovation Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning
[24]  
Marengo L., 1990, METROECONOMICA, V41, P19
[25]  
MASSINI S, 1998, C EC SCI TECHN MICR
[26]  
Metcalfe S, 1995, Handbook of the Economics of Innovations and Technological Change, P409
[27]  
Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2001, EC STAT ANN
[28]   Interrelationships among the elements of national innovation systems: A statistical evaluation [J].
Nasierowski, W ;
Arcelus, FJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 119 (02) :235-253
[29]  
National Bureau of Statistics, 1998, CHIN STAT YB SCI TEC
[30]  
Nelson R.R., 1993, NATL INNOVATION SYST, P3