A Computational Evaluation of Sentence Processing Deficits in Aphasia

被引:23
作者
Patil, Umesh [1 ]
Hanne, Sandra [1 ]
Burchert, Frank [1 ]
De Bleser, Ria [1 ]
Vasishth, Shravan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Dept Linguist, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Aphasia; Non-canonical sentences; Sentence-picture matching; Eye movements; Computational modeling; Cognitive architecture; Individual differences; AGRAMMATIC BROCAS APHASIA; REAL-TIME PRODUCTION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; SYNTACTIC COMPREHENSION; WORKING-MEMORY; WH-MOVEMENT; CHANCE PERFORMANCE; SEMANTIC DEMENTIA; LEFT-HEMISPHERE; TRACE-DELETION;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12250
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
010107 [宗教学];
摘要
Individuals with agrammatic Broca's aphasia experience difficulty when processing reversible non-canonical sentences. Different accounts have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. The Trace Deletion account (Grodzinsky, 1995, 2000, 2006) attributes this deficit to an impairment in syntactic representations, whereas others (e.g., Caplan, Waters, Dede, Michaud, & Reddy, 2007; Haarmann, Just, & Carpenter, 1997) propose that the underlying structural representations are unimpaired, but sentence comprehension is affected by processing deficits, such as slow lexical activation, reduction in memory resources, slowed processing and/or intermittent deficiency, among others. We test the claims of two processing accounts, slowed processing and intermittent deficiency, and two versions of the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH), in a computational framework for sentence processing (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005) implemented in ACT-R (Anderson, Byrne, Douglass, Lebiere, & Qin, 2004). The assumption of slowed processing is operationalized as slow procedural memory, so that each processing action is performed slower than normal, and intermittent deficiency as extra noise in the procedural memory, so that the parsing steps are more noisy than normal. We operationalize the TDH as an absence of trace information in the parse tree. To test the predictions of the models implementing these theories, we use the data from a German sentencepicture matching study reported in Hanne, Sekerina, Vasishth, Burchert, and De Bleser (2011). The data consist of offline (sentence-picture matching accuracies and response times) and online (eye fixation proportions) measures. From among the models considered, the model assuming that both slowed processing and intermittent deficiency are present emerges as the best model of sentence processing difficulty in aphasia. The modeling of individual differences suggests that, if we assume that patients have both slowed processing and intermittent deficiency, they have them in differing degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 50
页数:46
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]
Aho A. V., 1972, The Theory of Parsing, Translation, and Compiling
[2]
Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models [J].
Allopenna, PD ;
Magnuson, JS ;
Tanenhaus, MK .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (04) :419-439
[3]
The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing [J].
Altmann, Gerry T. M. ;
Kamide, Yuki .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2007, 57 (04) :502-518
[4]
Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference [J].
Altmann, GTM ;
Kamide, Y .
COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) :247-264
[5]
An integrated theory of the mind [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Bothell, D ;
Byrne, MD ;
Douglass, S ;
Lebiere, C ;
Qin, YL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (04) :1036-1060
[6]
[Anonymous], CONNECTIONIST PSYCHO
[7]
Avrutin S., 2006, BROCAS REGION, P49
[8]
The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors [J].
Badecker, W ;
Straub, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2002, 28 (04) :748-769
[9]
A FINAL BRIEF IN THE CASE AGAINST AGRAMMATISM - THE ROLE OF THEORY IN THE SELECTION OF DATA [J].
BADECKER, W ;
CARAMAZZA, A .
COGNITION, 1986, 24 (03) :277-282
[10]
Double-agents and trace-deletion in agrammatism [J].
Beretta, A ;
Munn, A .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 65 (03) :404-421