Limitations of current validation protocols for home blood pressure monitors for individual patients

被引:56
作者
Gerin, W
Schwartz, AR
Schwartz, JE
Pickering, TG
Davidson, KW
Bress, J
O'Brien, E
Atkins, N
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Zena & Michael A Wiener Cardiovasc Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Joan & Sanford I Weill Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[5] Beaumont Hosp, Blood Pressure Unit, Dublin 9, Ireland
关键词
hypertension; validation; measurement; blood pressure; blood pressure monitoring;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200212000-00004
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Automatic blood pressure monitoring conducted at home is increasingly used in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. We assessed the adequacy of existing British Hypertension Society (BHS) and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) validation standards for automatic blood pressure monitoring devices. Subject and methods A theoretical study and an empirical test are presented to estimate the proportion of persons for whom a blood pressure monitor validated according to existing BHS and AAMI standards would inaccurate. Results The results suggest that a major limitation of both protocols is the lack of attention given to the number of individual patients for whom a monitor may e inaccurate. A blood pressure monitor that meets the AAMI and BHS validation criteria may report blood pressures in error by more than 5 mmHg for more than half of the people. Conclusions A validation standard that does not take account of the person-effects on error will lead to a substantial proportion of persons using self-monitors that are systematically inaccurate for that person. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Myers MG, 1996, CAN J CARDIOL, V12, P1271
  • [12] Consequences of banning mercury and the cuff controversy
    O'Brien, E
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2000, 5 (01) : 33 - 34
  • [13] O'Brien E., 1993, J HYPERTENSION S2, V11, P43, DOI DOI 10.1097/00004872-199306000-00013
  • [14] OBRIEN E, 1994, J HYPERTENS, V12, P1089
  • [15] THE BRITISH-HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY PROTOCOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED AND SEMIAUTOMATED BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMBULATORY SYSTEMS
    OBRIEN, E
    PETRIE, J
    LITTLER, W
    DESWIET, M
    PADFIELD, PL
    OMALLEY, K
    JAMIESON, M
    ALTMAN, D
    BLAND, M
    ATKINS, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (07) : 607 - 619
  • [16] FUNCTION POINTS IN SSADM
    OBRIEN, SJ
    JONES, DA
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 1993, 2 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [17] Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan
    Ohkubo, T
    Imai, Y
    Tsuji, I
    Nagai, K
    Kato, J
    Kikuchi, N
    Nishiyama, A
    Aihara, A
    Sekino, M
    Kikuya, M
    Ito, S
    Satoh, H
    Hisamichi, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 16 (07) : 971 - 975
  • [18] THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURES
    PERLOFF, D
    SOKOLOW, M
    COWAN, R
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 249 (20): : 2792 - 2798
  • [19] HOW COMMON IS WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION
    PICKERING, TG
    JAMES, GD
    BODDIE, C
    HARSHFIELD, GA
    BLANK, S
    LARAGH, JH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (02): : 225 - 228
  • [20] ROCCELLA E, 1990, ARCH INTERN MED, V150, P2270