Safety and effectiveness of methohexital for procedural sedation in the emergency department

被引:19
作者
Austin, T
Vilke, GM
Nyheim, E
Kelly, D
Chan, TC
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Med, Dept Emergency Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Sch Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
methohexital; procedural sedation; emergency department; orthopedic;
D O I
10.1016/S0736-4679(02)00767-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Use of methohexital as an agent for moderate procedural sedation in the Emergency Department (ED) recently has increased. As a barbiturate, potential complications include respiratory and myocardial depression. We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and procedural flow charts for all use of methohexital in our ED during a 31-month period. We collected data on medication use, adjunctive medications, indications, procedural success, and complications. Overall, there were 114 orthopedic procedures performed using methohexital (mean dose of 1.43 mg/kg) for sedation on 104 patients. Procedures included shoulder dislocation reduction (26.3%), hip dislocation reduction (25.4%), elbow dislocation reduction (15.2%), and fracture reduction (25.4%). There was an 80.8% success rate with the first dose of methohexital. Complications occurred in 20.2% of patients and included oxygen desaturation, hypotension, hypoventilation, vomiting, tremor, and airway obstruction. All complications were transient and managed without sequelae. Use of concurrent parenteral opioid medications had no significant impact on success or complications. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 318
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Ann Emerg Med, V31, P663
[2]   FREQUENT HYPOXEMIA AND APNEA AFTER SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL [J].
BAILEY, PL ;
PACE, NL ;
ASHBURN, MA ;
MOLL, JWB ;
EAST, KA ;
STANLEY, TH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (05) :826-830
[3]   Pharmacology of emergency department pain management and conscious sedation [J].
Blackburn, P ;
Vissers, R .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 18 (04) :803-+
[4]  
Bono J V, 1993, Orthop Rev, V22, P833
[6]   A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of methohexital in the emergency department [J].
Lerman, B ;
Yoshida, D ;
Levitt, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 14 (04) :351-354
[7]   Ionic mechanisms mediating the differential effects of methohexital and thiopental on action potential duration in guinea pig and rabbit isolated ventricular myocytes [J].
Martynyuk, AE ;
Morey, TE ;
Raatikainen, MJP ;
Seubert, CN ;
Dennis, DM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (01) :156-164
[8]   PRACTICAL COST-EFFECTIVE CHOICES - AMBULATORY GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
PHILIP, BK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (07) :606-613
[9]   Rectal methohexital sedation for computed tomography imaging of stable pediatric emergency department patients [J].
Pomeranz, ES ;
Chudnofsky, CR ;
Deegan, TJ ;
Lozon, MM ;
Mitchiner, JC ;
Weber, JE .
PEDIATRICS, 2000, 105 (05) :1110-1114
[10]   MIDAZOLAM USE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
WRIGHT, SW ;
CHUDNOFSKY, CR ;
DRONEN, SC ;
WRIGHT, MB ;
BORRON, SW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 8 (02) :97-100