Economic Analysis: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Erlotinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

被引:57
作者
Bradbury, Penelope A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tu, Dongsheng [1 ]
Seymour, Lesley [1 ]
Isogai, Pierre K. [4 ]
Zhu, Liting [1 ]
Ng, Raymond [2 ,3 ]
Mittmann, Nicole [1 ,4 ]
Tsao, Ming-Sound [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Evans, William K. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Shepherd, Frances A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leighl, Natasha B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NCIC Clin Trials Grp, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Div Med Oncol & Hematol, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Res Ctr, HOPE, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Canc Ctr Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2010年 / 102卷 / 05期
关键词
SUPPORTIVE CARE; DOCETAXEL; COST; INSTITUTE; GEFITINIB;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djp518
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The NCIC Clinical Trials Group conducted the BR. 21 trial, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of erlotinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This trial accrued patients between August 14, 2001, and January 31, 2003, and found that overall survival and quality of life were improved in the erlotinib arm than in the placebo arm. However, funding restrictions limit access to erlotinib in many countries. We undertook an economic analysis of erlotinib treatment in this trial and explored different molecular and clinical predictors of outcome to determine the cost-effectiveness of treating various populations with erlotinib. Methods Resource utilization was determined from individual patient data in the BR. 21 trial database. The trial recruited 731 patients (488 in the erlotinib arm and 243 in the placebo arm). Costs arising from erlotinib treatment, diagnostic tests, outpatient visits, acute hospitalization, adverse events, lung cancer-related concomitant medications, transfusions, and radiation therapy were captured. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as the ratio of incremental cost (in 2007 Canadian dollars) to incremental effectiveness (life-years gained). In exploratory analyses, we evaluated the benefits of treatment in selected subgroups to determine the impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for erlotinib treatment in the BR. 21 trial population was $ 94 638 per life-year gained (95% confidence interval = $ 52 359 to $ 429 148). The major drivers of cost-effectiveness included the magnitude of survival benefit and erlotinib cost. Subgroup analyses revealed that erlotinib may be more cost-effective in never-smokers or patients with high EGFR gene copy number. Conclusion With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $ 94 638 per life-year gained, erlotinib treatment for patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer is marginally cost-effective. The use of molecular predictors of benefit for targeted agents may help identify more or less cost-effective subgroups for treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 306
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STAT ANAL COST EFFEC
[3]   Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study BR.21 [J].
Bezjak, Andrea ;
Tu, Dongsheng ;
Seymour, Lesley ;
Clark, Gary ;
Trajkovic, Aleksandra ;
Zukin, Mauro ;
Ayoub, Joseph ;
Lago, Sergio ;
de Albuquerque Ribeiro, Ronaldo ;
Gerogianni, Alexandra ;
Cyjon, Arnold ;
Noble, Jonathan ;
Laberge, Francis ;
Chan, Raymond Tsz-Tong ;
Fenton, David ;
von Pawel, Joachim ;
Reck, Martin ;
Shepherd, Frances A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (24) :3831-3837
[4]  
BRADBURY P, 2007, J THORAC ONCOL S4, V8
[5]   Ethnic differences in response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors [J].
Calvo, Emiliano ;
Baselga, Jose .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (14) :2158-2163
[6]   Comparative clinical and economic outcomes of treatments for refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [J].
Carlson, Josh J. ;
Reyes, Carolina ;
Oestreicher, Nina ;
Lubeck, Deborah ;
Ramsey, Scott D. ;
Veenstra, David L. .
LUNG CANCER, 2008, 61 (03) :405-415
[7]   The Potential Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Pharmacogenomic Approaches to EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Carlson, Josh J. ;
Garrison, Louis P. ;
Ramsey, Scott D. ;
Veenstra, David L. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (01) :20-27
[8]   Managing dermatologic toxicities of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors [J].
Chou, Lillian S. ;
Garey, Jody ;
Oishi, Karen ;
Kim, Edward .
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2006, 8 :S15-S22
[9]   The cost of lung cancer in Alberta [J].
Demeter, Sandor J. ;
Jacobs, Philip ;
Chniielowiec, ChesLer ;
I-Ogus, Wayne ;
Hailey, David ;
Fassbender, Konrad ;
McEwan, Alexander .
CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (02) :81-86
[10]   Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology [J].
Earle, CC ;
Chapman, RH ;
Baker, CS ;
Bell, CM ;
Stone, PW ;
Sandberg, EA ;
Neumann, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (18) :3302-3317