The "Minimal Essential MHC" revisited: Both peptide-binding and cell surface expression level of MHC molecules are polymorphisms selected by pathogens in chickens

被引:64
作者
Kaufman, J [1 ]
Salomonsen, J
机构
[1] Inst Anim Hlth, Compton RG20 7NN, Berks, England
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Inst Vet Microbiol, Dept Virol & Immunol, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
来源
HEREDITAS | 1997年 / 127卷 / 1-2期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1601-5223.1997.t01-1-00067.x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Birds, like mammals, have a highly polymorphic MHC that determines strong allograft rejection. However, in contrast to mammals, there are a number of viral diseases for which resistance and susceptibility are determined by particular chicken MHC haplotypes. We have found that certain common chicken MHC haplotypes express only one class I molecule at high levels. The selection on a single MHC gene should be strong, in contrast to the situation in mammals. We have determined the peptide motifs for the dominant class I molecules from a number of chicken MHC haplotypes and found that they can explain the outcome of infections with a small virus. However, the strongest MHC association is the resistance of the chicken B21 haplotype to classical Marek's disease virus, a relatively large pathogen for which any MHC molecule should find peptides. In 40 chicken lines, the level of class I expression correlates with the level of MHC-determined susceptibility to Marek's disease, the most susceptible B19 with the highest expression and the most resistant B21 with the lowest expression. Thus, cell surface expression level of class I molecules appears to be a polymorphism under selection by infectious pathogens, just like peptide-binding specificity. We speculate that these expression level differences are another manifestation of the simple MHC of chickens, which in human and mouse haplotypes are averaged out.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   3-LOCUS MODEL FOR CHICKEN MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX [J].
PINK, JRL ;
DROEGE, W ;
HALA, K ;
MIGGIANO, VC ;
ZIEGLER, A .
IMMUNOGENETICS, 1977, 5 (03) :203-216
[32]  
PLACHY J, 1992, CRIT REV IMMUNOL, V12, P47
[33]   EVOLUTION OF MHC GENETIC DIVERSITY - A TALE OF INCEST, PESTILENCE AND SEXUAL PREFERENCE [J].
POTTS, WK ;
WAKELAND, EK .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 1993, 9 (12) :408-412
[34]   MCH LIGANDS AND PEPTIDE MOTIFS - FIRST LISTING [J].
RAMMENSEE, HG ;
FRIEDE, T ;
STEVANOVIC, S .
IMMUNOGENETICS, 1995, 41 (04) :178-228
[35]   The chicken beta(2)-microglobulin gene is located on a non-major histocompatibility complex microchromosome: A small, G+C-rich gene with X and Y boxes in the promoter [J].
Riegert, P ;
Andersen, R ;
Bumstead, N ;
Dohring, C ;
DominguezSteglich, M ;
Engberg, J ;
Salomonsen, J ;
Schmid, M ;
Schwager, J ;
Skjodt, K ;
Kaufman, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (03) :1243-1248
[36]   Influence of chicken genotype on protection against Marek's disease by a herpesvirus of turkeys recombinant expressing the glycoprotein B (gB) of Marek's disease virus [J].
Ross, N ;
OSullivan, G ;
Coudert, F .
VACCINE, 1996, 14 (03) :187-189
[37]   PROMINENT ROLE OF SECONDARY ANCHOR RESIDUES IN PEPTIDE BINDING TO HLA-A2.1 MOLECULES [J].
RUPPERT, J ;
SIDNEY, J ;
CELIS, E ;
KUBO, RT ;
GREY, HM ;
SETTE, A .
CELL, 1993, 74 (05) :929-937
[38]   INTENSITY OF NATURAL-SELECTION AT THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX LOCI [J].
SATTA, Y ;
OHUIGIN, C ;
TAKAHATA, N ;
KLEIN, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1994, 91 (15) :7184-7188
[39]  
Schat K. A., 1987, Avian immunology: basis and practice. Volume II., P101
[40]  
SHUM BP, 1993, J IMMUNOL, V151, P5376