ERP indices for response inhibition are related to anxiety-related personality traits

被引:128
作者
Sehlmeyer, C. [1 ,2 ]
Konrad, C. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Zwitserlood, P. [5 ]
Arolt, V. [1 ]
Falkenstein, M. [4 ]
Beste, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Munster, Interdisciplinary Ctr Clin Res, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Cognit Neurosci, Bochum, Germany
[4] Leibniz Res Ctr, Dortmund, Germany
[5] Univ Munster, Dept Psychol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[6] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
关键词
Trait anxiety; Anxiety sensitivity; Event-related potentials (ERPs); Response inhibition; Nogo-N2; Nogo-P3; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; STIMULUS PROBABILITY; SUSTAINED ATTENTION; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; CONFLICT; THREAT; ASSOCIATION; MODULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Anxiety is often associated with impaired cognitive control and avoidance behaviour. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of anxiety-related personality traits, such as anxiety sensitivity and trait anxiety, on event-related potentials of response inhibition in a standard Go/Nogo-paradigm. We focused on the Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3 components, which probably represent different sub-processes of response inhibition. The Nogo-N2 was mainly influenced by trait anxiety, while it was slightly affected by anxiety sensitivity. In contrast, the Nogo-P3 was significantly associated with anxiety sensitivity, but was less affected by trait anxiety. Thus, anxious subjects seem to maintain a higher level of cognitive control to prepare and to monitor the outcome of their actions, which is differentially reflected in Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3 potentials. Our results show that anxiety-related personality traits modulate electrophysiological responses related to cognitive control processes and should be taken into consideration in studies investigating response inhibition. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2488 / 2495
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, The state-trait anxiety inventory
[2]   Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study [J].
Bar-Haim, Yair ;
Lamy, Dominique ;
Pergamin, Lee ;
Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J. ;
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (01) :1-24
[3]   PARADOXICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE BRAIN-DERIVED-NEUROTROPHIC-FACTOR val66met GENOTYPE WITH RESPONSE INHIBITION [J].
Beste, C. ;
Baune, B. T. ;
Domschke, K. ;
Falkenstein, M. ;
Konrad, C. .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 166 (01) :178-184
[4]   Response inhibition in Huntington's disease - A study using ERPs and sLORETA [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Saft, Carsten ;
Andrich, Juergen ;
Gold, Ralf ;
Falkenstein, Michael .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (05) :1290-1297
[5]   Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: Basal ganglia disease effects [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Willemssen, Rita ;
Saft, Carsten ;
Falkenstein, Michael .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (02) :366-373
[6]   Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson's disease [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Dziobek, Isabel ;
Hielscher, Horst ;
Willemssen, Rita ;
Falkenstein, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (04) :855-860
[7]   Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task [J].
Bokura, H ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Kobayashi, S .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (12) :2224-2232
[8]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[9]   Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) :1172-1182
[10]   Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Bush, G ;
Luu, P ;
Posner, MI .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (06) :215-222