Performance Management for Social Enterprises

被引:42
作者
Meadows, Maureen [1 ]
Pike, Matthew [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Open Univ Business Sch, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Matthew Pike & Associates, Rugby, England
关键词
Performance measurement; Performance management; Balanced Scorecard; Social enterprises; SYSTEMS THINKING; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s11213-009-9149-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
All organisations face the challenge of how to assess performance beyond current financial metrics. These challenges are felt especially strongly by social enterprises, organisations that use business methods to achieve social goals. Social enterprises need to evidence superior social outcomes, are normally accountable to a complex range of stakeholders and yet are often rated low to medium in terms of organisational capacity-thus whilst they have a great need for rounded measurement, they may in practice lack the ability to make use of the different approaches on offer. This paper examines the current and potential use of the conventional Balanced Scorecard model, by social enterprises. The Adventure Capital Fund provides case study evidence of extensive use of a modified Scorecard. The model used is dynamic, combining reflection on the organisation's current position, 'near term' and long term issues. It aims to take a holistic and coherent view of the management of social enterprises. Experience to date suggests that the medium term snapshot provided by the Scorecard is the most valuable, allowing organisations and especially boards and senior executives to keep a 'strategic grip' in a period of rapid change and focus on those actions that have best chance of changing performance in the round.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Strategy & leadership
[2]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag, DOI DOI 10.1108/17410400410561259
[5]   A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives [J].
Barton, J ;
Emery, M ;
Flood, RL ;
Selsky, JW ;
Wolstenholme, E .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2004, 17 (01) :3-36
[6]   The NHS performance assessment framework as a balanced scorecard approach Limitations and implications [J].
Chang, Li-Cheng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2007, 20 (02) :101-+
[7]  
de Haas M., 1999, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V10, P233, DOI [10.1006/mare.1998.0098, DOI 10.1006/MARE.1998.0098]
[8]   Knowing of the unknowable [J].
Flood, RL .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 1999, 12 (03) :247-256
[9]   The impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector environment - Empirical evidence from Dunedin City Council, New Zealand [J].
Greatbanks, Richard ;
Tapp, David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) :846-873
[10]   Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance [J].
Halachmi, Arie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 54 (07) :502-516