Effect of environmental dynamism on relational governance in manufacturer supplier relationships: A contingency framework and an empirical test

被引:107
作者
Joshi, AW [1 ]
Campbell, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
environmental dynamism; relational governance; interparty learning theory;
D O I
10.1177/0092070302250901
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The effect of dynamism in the downstream (i.e., customer and competitive) environment on the manner in which manufacturers manage their upstream (i.e., supplier) relationships is not well understood in the literature. While some prior studies suggest that manufacturers will adopt relational governance with suppliers in response to dynamism in the downstream environment, other studies suggest that manufacturers will avoid relational governance with suppliers when faced with environmental dynamism. Drawing from the literature on interparty learning, the authors develop a conceptual framework wherein the validating conditions for each conclusion are identified. Results from a survey of 221 manufacturing organizations show that in dynamic environments, manufacturers adopt (avoid) relational governance with suppliers under two conditions: (1) when manufacturer collaborative belief is high (low) and (2) when supplier knowledge is high (low). The results are discussed in terms of their managerial and future research implications.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 188
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[51]   The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances [J].
Larsson, R ;
Bengtsson, L ;
Henriksson, K ;
Sparks, J .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (03) :285-305
[52]   Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm [J].
Liebeskind, JP .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :93-107
[53]   Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels [J].
Lusch, RF ;
Brown, JR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1996, 60 (04) :19-38
[54]   Antecedents and consequences of marketing strategy making: A model and a test [J].
Menon, A ;
Bharadwaj, SG ;
Adidam, PT ;
Edison, SW .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1999, 63 (02) :18-40
[55]   Theories of economic organization: The case for realism and balance [J].
Moran, P ;
Ghoshal, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (01) :58-72
[56]  
Mudambi R, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P775, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<775::AID-SMJ970>3.3.CO
[57]  
2-M
[58]   Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage [J].
Nahapiet, J ;
Ghoshal, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :242-266
[59]  
Neter J., 1990, APPL STAT MODELS
[60]  
NOORDEWIER TG, 1990, J MARKETING, V54, P79