Employee-driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation

被引:198
作者
Kesting, Peter [1 ]
Ulhoi, John Parm [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus Sch Business, Dept Management, Ctr Org Renewal & Evolut, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Innovation; Employees participation; Decision making; Organizational culture; Human capital; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; WORK-ENVIRONMENT; CREATIVITY; TEAMS; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP; DISCOVERY; SUPPORT; CLIMATE; VIEW;
D O I
10.1108/00251741011014463
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to outline the "grand structure" of the phenomenon in order to identify both the underlying processes and core drivers of employee-driven innovation (EDI). Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual paper. It particularly applies the insights of contemporary research on routine and organizational decision making to the specific case of EDI. Findings - The main result of the paper is that, from a theoretical point of view, it makes perfect sense to involve ordinary employees in innovation decisions. However, it is also outlined that naive or ungoverned participation is counterproductive, and that it is quite difficult to realize the hidden potential in a supportive way. Research limitations/implications - The main implication is that basic mechanisms for employee participation also apply to innovation decisions, although often in a different way. However, the paper only identifies the grand structure of the phenomenon. The different identified drivers have to be further elaborated and empirically tested. Practical implications - EDI is a helpful tool to gain competitive advantage by utilizing the knowledge and creative potential of employees. Originality/value - This is the first paper that gives a systematic overview of the grand structure of EDI and derives the most important moderating factors from that.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 84
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[31]   Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness [J].
Guzzo, RA ;
Dickson, MW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 47 :307-338
[32]  
Hansen MT, 2007, HARVARD BUS REV, V85, P121
[33]  
Henderson J., 2001, Management Decision, V39, P461, DOI DOI 10.1108/00251740110397587
[34]  
Hofstede G., 2005, CULTURES ORG
[35]   TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP, LOCUS OF CONTROL, AND SUPPORT FOR INNOVATION - KEY PREDICTORS OF CONSOLIDATED-BUSINESS-UNIT PERFORMANCE [J].
HOWELL, JM ;
AVOLIO, BJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (06) :891-902
[36]  
Howells J., 2005, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO
[37]  
Jeffrey Richard C., 1983, LOGIC DECISION, V2nd
[38]   THEORY OF FIRM - MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE [J].
JENSEN, MC ;
MECKLING, WH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1976, 3 (04) :305-360
[39]   Could HRM support organizational innovation? [J].
Jimenez-Jimenez, Daniel ;
Sanz-Valle, Raquel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 19 (07) :1208-1221
[40]  
Jorgensen F., 2006, Creativity and Innovation Management, V15, P328, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00404.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2006.00404.X]