Effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients

被引:34
作者
Fogari, R [1 ]
Malamani, GD [1 ]
Zoppi, A [1 ]
Mugellini, A [1 ]
Rinaldi, A [1 ]
Vanasia, A [1 ]
Preti, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Med Clin, Dipartimento Med Interna, IRCCS,Policlin S Matteo, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
benazepril; amlodipine; ankle oedema;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jhh.1001533
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine anti hypertensive treatment on ankle-foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP), two objective measures of ankle oedema. A total of 32 mild to moderate essential hypertensives (DBP>90 and <110 mmHg), aged 30-70 years were studied. After a 4-week placebo period, they were randomized to amlodipine 5 mg o.d. or benazepril 10 mg o.d. or amlodipine 5 mg plus benazepril 10 mg o.d. for 4 weeks, according to a crossover design. At the end of the placebo period and of each active treatment period, blood pressure,AFV and PSTP were evaluated. AFV was measured using the principle of water displacement. PSTP was assessed using a system, the subcutaneous pretibial interstitial environment with a water manometer. Both amlodipine and benazepril monotherapy significantly reduced SBP (-18.2 +/- 4 and -17.8 +/- 4mmHg, respectively, P<0.01 vs baseline) and DBP (-12.1+/-3 and -11.7+/-3 mmHg, respectively, P<0.01); the reduction was increased by the combination (-24.2 +/- 5 mmHg for SBP, P<0.001 and -16.8+/-4mmHg for DBP, P<0.001). Amlodipine monotherapy significantly increased both AFV (+17.1%, P<0.001 vs baseline) and PSTP (+56.6%, P<0.001 vs baseline). As compared to amlodipine alone, the combination produced a less pronounced increase in AFV (+5.5%, P<0.05 vs baseline and P<0.01 vs amlodipine) and PSTP (+20.5%, P<0.05 vs baseline and P<0.01 vs amlodipine). Ankle oedema was clinically evident in 11 patients with amlodipine monotherapy and in three patients with the combination. These results suggest that ACE-inhibitors partially counteract the microcirculatory changes responsible for Ca-antagonists-induced oedema formation.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 212
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]  
LAUDERER A, GEWEBSPANNUNG IHREN, P174
[12]  
MALAMANI V., 1947, BOLL SOC ITAL BIOL SPERIM, V23, P125
[13]  
MALAMANI V, 1957, TIPOGRAFIA POPOLARE, V485
[14]   SINGLE-DRUG THERAPY FOR HYPERTENSION IN MEN - A COMPARISON OF 6 ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS WITH PLACEBO [J].
MATERSON, BJ ;
REDA, DJ ;
CUSHMAN, WC ;
MASSIE, BM ;
FREIS, ED ;
KOCHAR, MS ;
HAMBURGER, RJ ;
FYE, C ;
LAKSHMAN, R ;
GOTTDIENER, J ;
RAMIREZ, EA ;
HENDERSON, WG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (13) :914-921
[15]  
Messerli FH, 1999, AM J HYPERTENS, V12, p86S
[16]   Vasodilatory edema: A common side effect of hypertensive therapy [J].
Messerli, FH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 14 (09) :978-979
[17]   Comparison of efficacy and side effects of combination therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (Benazepril) with calcium agonist (either nifedipine or amlodipine) versus high-dose calcium antagonist monotherapy for systemic hypertension [J].
Messerli, FH ;
Oparil, S ;
Feng, ZB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (11) :1182-1187
[18]   Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension [J].
Pedrinelli, R ;
Dell'Omo, G ;
Melillo, E ;
Mariani, M .
HYPERTENSION, 2000, 35 (02) :621-625
[19]   IMPAIRED VENOARTERIOLAR REFLEX AS A POSSIBLE CAUSE FOR NIFEDIPINE-INDUCED ANKLE EDEMA [J].
SALMASI, AM ;
BELCARO, G ;
NICOLAIDES, AN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 30 (03) :303-307
[20]   FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS - DO THEY HAVE A ROLE IN RATIONAL THERAPY [J].
SICA, DA .
DRUGS, 1994, 48 (01) :16-24