Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration

被引:268
作者
Armstrong, DG
Lavery, LA
Vela, SA
Quebedeaux, TL
Fleischli, JG
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[2] Diabet Foot Res Grp, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Mexican Amer Med Treatment Effectiveness Res Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.158.3.289
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 3 sensory perception testing instruments to screen for risk of diabetic foot ulceration. Methods: This case-control study prospectively measured the degree of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients with and without foot ulcers. We enrolled 115 age-matched diabetic patients (40% male) with a case-control ratio of approximately 1:3 (30 cases and 85 controls) from a tertiary care diabetic foot specialty clinic. Cases were defined as individuals who had an existing foot ulceration or a history of a recently (<4 weeks) healed foot ulceration. Controls were defined as subjects with no foot ulceration history. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of 2 commonly used neuropathy assessment tools (vibration perception threshold testing and the Semmes-Weinstein 10-g monofilament wire system) and a 4-question verbal neuropathy score to evaluate for presence of foot ulceration. Results: A vibration perception threshold test using 25 V and lack of perception at 4 or more sites using the Semmes-Weinstein 10-g monofilament wire system had a significantly higher specificity than the neuropathy score used. The neuropathy score was most sensitive when 1 or more answers were affirmative. When modalities were combined, particularly the monofilament wire system plus vibration perception threshold testing and the neuropathy score plus the monofilament wire system, there was a substantial increase in specificity with little or no diminution in sensitivity. Conclusions: The early detection of peripheral neuropathy or loss of "protective sensation" is paramount to instituting a structured treatment plan to prevent lower extremity amputation. The results of our study suggest that all 3 sensory perception testing instruments are sensitive in identifying patients at risk for ulceration. Combining modalities appears to increase specificity with very little or no diminution in sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 292
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] THE INDEPENDENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF DIABETIC NEUROPATHY AND VASCULOPATHY IN FOOT ULCERATION - HOW GREAT ARE THE RISKS
    MCNEELY, MJ
    BOYKO, EJ
    AHRONI, JH
    STENSEL, VL
    REIBER, GE
    SMITH, DG
    PECORARO, RE
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (02) : 216 - 219
  • [22] Identifying patients with diabetes mellitus who are at risk for lower-extremity complications: Use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments
    Mueller, MJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 76 (01): : 68 - 71
  • [23] MUELLER MJ, 1989, PHYS THER, V69, P453, DOI 10.1093/ptj/69.6.453
  • [24] NISHIKAWA J, 1989, CLIN RES, V37, P525
  • [25] THE SEMMES-WEINSTEIN MONOFILAMENT AS A POTENTIAL PREDICTOR OF FOOT ULCERATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONINSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES
    OLMOS, PR
    CATALAND, S
    ODORISIO, TM
    CASEY, CA
    SMEAD, WL
    SIMON, SR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 309 (02) : 76 - 82
  • [26] PATHWAYS TO DIABETIC LIMB AMPUTATION - BASIS FOR PREVENTION
    PECORARO, RE
    REIBER, GE
    BURGESS, EM
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1990, 13 (05) : 513 - 521
  • [27] SWARTZ MH, 1989, PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS, P73
  • [28] TSUJI L, 1992, DIABETES CARE, V14, P1075
  • [29] Valk GD, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P116, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199701)20:1<116::AID-MUS19>3.0.CO
  • [30] 2-2