Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery access in peripheral vascular angiography

被引:45
作者
Armstrong, PJ
Han, DC
Baxter, JA
Elmore, JR
Franklin, DP
机构
[1] Geisinger Med Ctr, Vasc Surg Sect, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Sect Intervent Radiol, Danville, PA 17822 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10016-001-0339-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The brachial artery has been considered a secondary choice for percutaneous access due to reported increased complication rates compared to femoral access despite potential advantages in peripheral vascular disease (PVD) patients. A prospectively collected database of 1326 PVD patients undergoing angiography with percutaneous brachial access between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1999 was retrospectively reviewed. All patient charts with coded brachial pathology during this time period were reviewed to ensure complete data capture. The protocol for patients undergoing brachial access included a vascular surgery evaluation after each angiogram and telephone follow-up by a nurse at 24 hr. During this 10-year period, a percutaneous brachial artery approach was used to perform 1084 angiograms in men and 242 angiograms in women. A subset of 111 patients had multiple studies (range: 2 to 7) via brachial access without complication. Rates of failed access (2.1% female vs. 0% male, p < 0.001) and brachial thrombosis (1.24% female vs. 0.28% male, p < 0.04) were significantly higher in women. The complication rate for all patients was 1.28%. Percutaneous brachial access for angiography can be safely and repetitively performed in PVD patients, although women have an increased risk of thrombosis and failed access. The brachial approach allows early ambulation and discharge, and can be considered a primary choice for diagnostic angiographic access.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 110
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION AND CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY USING 5 FRENCH PREFORMED (JUDKINS) CATHETERS FROM THE PERCUTANEOUS RIGHT BRACHIAL APPROACH - A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS WITH THE FEMORAL APPROACH
    BUSH, CA
    VANFOSSEN, DB
    KOLIBASH, AJ
    MAGORIEN, RD
    BACON, JP
    ANSEL, GM
    EATON, GM
    RAMANCIK, MJ
    ORSINI, AR
    PALMER, SL
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 29 (04): : 267 - 272
  • [2] Clark DA, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V41, P384, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199708)41:4<384::AID-CCD6>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-1
  • [4] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PERCUTANEOUS ENTRY OF THE BRACHIAL-ARTERY VERSUS CUTDOWN AND ARTERIOTOMY FOR LEFT-SIDED CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION
    COHEN, M
    RENTROP, KP
    COHEN, BM
    HOLT, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 57 (08) : 682 - 684
  • [5] Brachial artery catheterization to facilitate endovascular grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Safety and rationale
    Criado, FJ
    Wilson, EP
    Abul-Khoudoud, O
    Barker, C
    Carpenter, J
    Fairman, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (06) : 1137 - 1141
  • [6] Gagliardi J M, 1990, Ann Vasc Surg, V4, P546, DOI 10.1016/S0890-5096(06)60836-4
  • [7] Management of infected femoral closure devices
    Geary, K
    Landers, JT
    Fiore, W
    Riggs, P
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 10 (02): : 161 - 163
  • [8] COMPLICATIONS OF OUTPATIENT TRANSBRACHIAL INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY - WORK IN PROGRESS
    GRITTER, KJ
    LAIDLAW, WW
    PETERSON, NT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (01) : 125 - 127
  • [9] TRANSBRACHIAL ARTERIOGRAPHY - TECHNIQUES AND COMPLICATIONS
    GROLLMAN, JH
    MARCUS, R
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 11 (01) : 32 - 35
  • [10] Grullon CP, 2000, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V12, P484