Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?

被引:911
作者
Hole, DG
Perkins, AJ
Wilson, JD
Alexander, IH
Grice, PV
Evans, AD
机构
[1] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[2] RSPB Scotland, Aberdeen AB10 1YP, Scotland
[3] RSPB Scotland, Edinburgh EH4 3TP, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] English Nat, Wareham BH20 5BN, Dorset, England
[5] English Nat, Peterborough PE1 1UA, England
关键词
organic farming; biodiversity; conventional farming; agri-environment schemes; comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The intensification and expansion of modern agriculture is amongst the greatest current threats to worldwide biodiversity. Over the last quarter of the 20th century, dramatic declines in both range and abundance of many species associated with farmland have been reported in Europe, reading to growing concern over the sustainability of current intensive farming practices. Purportedly 'sustainable' farming systems such as organic farming are now seen by many as a potential solution to this continued loss of biodiversity and receive substantial support in the form of subsidy payments through ELF and national government legislation. This paper assesses the impacts on biodiversity of organic farming, relative to conventional agriculture, through a review of comparative studies of the two systems, in order to determine whether it can deliver on the biodiversity benefits its proponents claim. It identifies a wide range of taxa, including birds and mammals, invertebrates and arable flora, that benefit from organic management through increases in abundance and/or species richness. It also highlights three broad management practices (prohibition/reduced use of chemical pesticides and inorganic fertilisers; sympathetic management of non-cropped habitats; and preservation of mixed farming) that are largely intrinsic (but not exclusive) to organic farming, and that are particularly beneficial for farmland wildlife. However, the review also draws attention to four key issues: (1) It remains unclear whether a 'holistic' whole-farm approach (i.e. organic) provides greater benefits to biodiversity than carefully targeted prescriptions applied to relatively small areas of cropped and/or non-cropped habitats within conventional agriculture (i.e. agri-environment schemes); (2) Many comparative studies encounter methodological problems, limiting their ability to draw quantitative conclusions; (3) Our knowledge of the impacts of organic farming in pastoral and upland agriculture is limited; (4) There remains a pressing need for longitudinal, system-level studies in order to address these issues and to fill in the gaps in our knowledge of the impacts of organic farming, before a full appraisal of its potential role in biodiversity conservation in agroecosystems can be made. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 130
页数:18
相关论文
共 199 条