Reduced intravascular catheter-related infection by routine use of antibiotic-bonded catheters in a surgical intensive care unit

被引:27
作者
Kamal, GD
Divishek, D
Kumar, GC
Porter, BR
Tatman, DJ
Adams, JR
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesia, Div Crit Care Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Program Hosp Epidemiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(97)00215-0
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
We report a comparative analysis of intravascular catheter-related infection before and after routine use of antibiotic-bonded catheters in an intensive care unit. Cefazolin-bonded catheters were placed in patients requiring catheterization for at least 3 days, or with remote infection, standard catheters at other times. One thousand forty-five catheters (259 patients) over 6 months were compared with 801 (236 antibiotic-bonded, 565 standard) catheters (239 patients) the next 6 months. After use of antibiotic-bonded catheters, we found: 1.7% catheters infected versus 3.7% (p = 0.01); catheter-associated bacteremia 0.1% versus 1.3% (p < 0.005); catheter-related infection rate 4.39 versus 10.73 per 1000 patient days (p < 0.005), and 5.06 versus 11.47 per 1000 catheter days (p < 0.01); and cumulative risk of infection decreased (p < 0.005). Antibiotic-bonded catheters were used with more remote infections (52% versus 27%, p < 0.001), had longer indwelling time (4.4 versus 3.1 days, p = 0.001), and more were inserted over a guide wire (66% vs. 28%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, routine use of antibiotic-bonded catheters was associated with a significant reduction in infectious complications. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Surface heparinization of central venous catheters reduces microbial colonization in vitro and in vivo: Results from a prospective, randomized trial [J].
Appelgren, P ;
RansjO, U ;
Bindslev, L ;
Espersen, F ;
Larm, O .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (09) :1482-1489
[2]   Infectious rates of central venous pressure catheters: Comparison between newly placed catheters and those that have been changed [J].
Badley, AD ;
Steckelberg, JM ;
Wollan, PC ;
Thompson, RL .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 71 (09) :838-846
[3]  
BEAM TR, 1990, INFECT SURG, P1
[4]   NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS - VALIDATION OF SURVEILLANCE AND COMPUTER MODELING TO IDENTIFY PATIENTS AT RISK [J].
BRODERICK, A ;
MORI, M ;
NETTLEMAN, MD ;
STREED, SA ;
WENZEL, RP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 131 (04) :734-742
[5]  
BROVIAC JW, 1974, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V139, P24
[6]  
*CDC WORK GROUP, 1981, INFECT CONTROL, V3, P62
[7]   A CONSERVATIVE PROCEDURE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS [J].
CERCENADO, E ;
ENA, J ;
RODRIGUEZCREIXEMS, M ;
ROMERO, I ;
BOUZA, E .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (07) :1417-1420
[8]  
Ciresi DL, 1996, AM SURGEON, V62, P641
[9]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT OF CENTRAL VENOUS AND PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERS [J].
COBB, DK ;
HIGH, KP ;
SAWYER, RG ;
SABLE, CA ;
ADAMS, RB ;
LINDLEY, DA ;
PRUETT, TL ;
SCHWENZER, KJ ;
FARR, BM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (15) :1062-1068
[10]  
DAROUICHE RO, 1996, CRIT CARE MED S, V24, pA121